Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms under population-level alcohol reduction to low-risk drinking: A parametric g-computation analysis in a U.S. nationwide cohort
Sanborn, J.; Nash, D.; Robertson, M.; Parcesepe, A.; Shahn, Z.
Show abstract
Background: Alcohol consumption is a modifiable risk factor linked to anxiety and depression, yet the population-level impact of reducing alcohol use on the prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms remains unclear. Prior studies are limited by methodological challenges including health-related selection into abstinence, time-varying confounding and reverse causation. Methods: We used data from 2,813 participants without documented underlying health conditions in a U.S. national longitudinal cohort (September 2021-December 2023) and applied the parametric g-formula within a target trial emulation framework to estimate the effect of a hypothetical intervention reducing alcohol consumption to low-risk levels on the prevalence of moderate-to-severe anxiety (GAD-7 [≥]10) and depression (PHQ-8 [≥]10) symptoms. The intervention set moderate- and high-risk drinking to low-risk at each follow-up, while leaving abstinent and low-risk drinking unchanged. Models adjusted for time-varying and baseline covariates, with uncertainty estimated using bootstrap resampling. Results: Under the natural course, the estimated prevalence of moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms was 12.67% (95% CI: 12.17, 13.23), compared to 12.77% (95% CI: 12.26, 13.29) under the intervention (risk difference: 0.10 percentage points; 95% CI: -0.22, 0.50). For anxiety symptoms, prevalence was 10.40% (95% CI: 8.89, 11.89) under the natural course and 10.25% (95% CI: 8.76, 11.98) under the intervention (risk difference: -0.15 percentage points; 95% CI: -0.68, 0.35). Conclusions: Under a hypothetical population-wide intervention reducing alcohol consumption to low-risk levels, differences in the prevalence of moderate or severe anxiety and depression symptoms were near null. These findings suggest that reducing alcohol use alone may be insufficient to meaningfully shift the population-wide burden of common mental health disorders.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact on alcohol selection and purchasing of increasing the proportion of non-alcoholic versus alcoholic drinks: randomised controlled trial 93%
- Identifying Potential Causal Risk Factors for Self-Harm: A Polygenic Risk Scoring and Mendelian Randomisation Approach 92%
- Risk of common psychiatric disorders, suicidal behaviours and premature mortality following violent victimisation: A matched cohort and sibling-comparison study of 127,628 people who experienced violence in Finland and Sweden 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterisation of alcohol polygenic risk scores in the context of mental health outcomes: Within-individual and intergenerational analyses in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children 93%
- Predicting Treatment-seeking Status for Alcohol Use Disorder Using Polygenic Scores and Machine Learning in a Deeply-Phenotyped Sample 93%
- Testing the association between tobacco and cannabis use and cognitive functioning: Findings from an observational and Mendelian randomization study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Cascade of Care for Alcohol Use Disorder: Using 2015-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Data to Identify Gaps in Care 94%
- Genes identified in rodent studies of alcohol intake are enriched for heritability of human substance use 92%
- “Maternal and offspring genetic risk score (GRS) analyses of fetal alcohol exposure and ADHD risk in offspring” 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Adolescent Internalizing Disorder Risk: Evidence from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study 92%
- Comorbidity of self-harm and disordered eating in young people: Evidence from a UK population-based cohort 91%
- The Cost-Effectiveness Of Depression Screening For The General Adult Population 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.