Back

Natural History and Post-transplant Outcomes Among Patients with Kidney Leukocyte Cell- Derived

Munawar Ali, I. F.; Lopez-Gutierrez, P. A.; Iftikhar, N.; Hanson, V.; Afrin, S.; Saelices Gomez, L.; Garcia, P. R.; Argyropoulos, C. P.

2026-08-03 nephrology
10.64898/2026.07.31.26359278 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: ALECT2 is the third most common cause of renal amyloidosis in the United States, with a strong predilection for Hispanic patients in the Southwest. (PMID:24522497) Despite its regional prevalence, the data on the trajectory of kidney function decline and post-transplant outcomes remain poorly characterized. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with ALECT2 by kidney biopsy at UNM from January 2014 to April 2024. Pre- and post-biopsy eGFR trajectories and post-transplant allograft function were analyzed. Results: 12 patients had pre-biopsy data available, with the mean age at diagnosis 64 SD 12.0 years, 8(67%) were females, and 8 identified as Hispanic. Mean eGFR at diagnosis was 31 (SD 29) indicating advanced kidney disease with 67% diagnosed as CKD stage 4 or 5. Concomitant kidney pathology was identified in 50% with diabetic nephropathy being present in 2/3 of those. A significant change in the eGFR trajectory identified at the time of biopsy through change point analysis [Figures A,C,D] Among four patients who underwent kidney transplantation, allograft eGFR remained stable over more than 60 months of follow-up [Figure D] Conclusion: In this cohort of predominantly Hispanic patients, ALECT2 amyloidosis presented with advanced CKD and accelerated loss of kidney function, which prompted a biopsy that detected the disease. Post- transplant allograft function was well maintained, supporting kidney transplantation as a viable treatment strategy for ALECT2-associated kidney disease.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.