The extent and durability of improvement in depressive symptoms, quality of life, and daily function with three years of vagus nerve stimulation in markedly treatment-resistant depression: A RECOVER study report
Conway, C. R.; Aaronson, S. T.; Rush, A. J.; Lee, Y.-C.; Shy, O.; Bunker, M. T.; Gordon, C.; Riva-Posse, P.; Reeves, K.; George, M. S.; Zajecka, J.; Nahas, Z.; Dunner, D. L.; Figee, M.; Mickey, B. J.; Allen, R. M.; Bohnenkamp, D.; Kriedt, C. L.; Hristidis, V. C.; Quevedo, J.; Zorumski, C. F.; Macaluso, M.; Duffy, W.; Sheline, Y.; Alva, G.; Cusin, C.; Bennett, J. I.; Tran, Q.; McIntyre, R. S.; McAllister-Williams, R. H.; Sackeim, H. A.
Show abstract
Background: Management of markedly treatment-resistant depression is characterized by low initial benefit and poor durability. Treatments with sustained benefits are needed. This report summarizes clinical outcomes and durability of both the active treatment arm (Early-Active) and the initially sham treatment arm (Delayed-Active) over the second and third years of the multicenter, prospective, implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) RECOVER trial. Methods: A total of 436 participants (N=221 Early-Active and N=215 Delayed-Active, 65.8% females) were studied. Within each group, analyses of change in benefit (depressive symptoms, clinical impression, quality of life [QoL], daily function, and a composite measure) occurred with assessments at 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. Two within-group methods of benefit appraisal over time were conducted: 1) a comparison of the degree of benefit change, and 2) a comparison of proportions of participants achieving benefit categories. Additionally, the degree of durability of benefit was assessed, comparing 12-24 months, 24-36 months, and 12-36 months. Results: For the Early-Active group: The 12-24-month and 12-36-month periods, but not the 24-36-month period, demonstrated significant improvement in benefit categories for depressive symptoms and clinical impression measures. Similarly, statistically significant increases in the proportions of participants achieving benefit during Year 2 for depressive and clinical impression measures occurred. For the Delayed-Active group: The 12-24-month (first exposure of this group to active VNS) and 12-36-month periods, but not the 24-36-month period, demonstrated statistically significant improvements in benefit categories for depressive symptoms and clinical impression measures. Additionally, statistically significant increases in the proportions of participants achieving benefit during Year 2 for depressive symptoms, clinical impression, QoL, daily function, and the composite measure were observed. Averaged across the depressive symptom and clinical impression measures, the Early-Active group demonstrated continued progression to higher benefit categories during Years 2 and 3, whereas the Delayed-Active group was characterized by the emergence of new benefit during Year 2 followed by further progression to higher benefit categories during Year 3. Durability: Robust durability of response was observed for both groups across all time intervals, with a median of 71.1% and 69.0% maintaining or improving benefit from 12 to 36 months for Early-Active and Delayed-Active, respectively. Conclusions: In a highly chronic and markedly resistant depressed sample, active VNS produced benefits that often emerged gradually, sometimes beyond one year after initiation, continued to improve in degree of benefit over time, and were highly durable. The time-associated benefit patterns observed in the sham group (Delayed-Active) closely resembled those of the initially active group (Early-Active) but were delayed by approximately one year, consistent with the delay in therapy activation.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Sequential Bilateral Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation in Adolescents With Suicidal Ideation Associated With Major Depressive Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- Systematic Review Protocol: The Effects of Theory-Based Interventions for Self-Help Practices in the Management of Mild to Moderate Depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pro-cognitive effects of 5-HT4 receptor agonism in individuals with remitted depression 95%
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 94%
- Emotional recognition training modifies neural response to emotional faces but does not improve mood in healthy volunteers with high levels of depressive symptoms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oral Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis 93%
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 93%
- Increased resting-state functional connectivity within theta and alpha frequency bands in dysphoria: Towards a novel measure of depression risk 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unilateral and Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Follow up on a Naturalistic Observation Study 93%
- Bilateral Sequential Theta Burst Stimulation for Multiple-Therapy-ResistantDepression: a naturalistic observation study 92%
- Estimating heterogeneity of treatment effect in psychiatric clinical trials 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ultrasound Applications in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): A Systematic Review of Techniques and Efficacy 94%
- Effectiveness of theta burst versus high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in Veterans with depression: a retrospective case series 93%
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.