Back

Distinct Working Memory for Near and Far in a T-Maze Delayed Alternation Task

Takita, M.; Ichitani, Y.

2026-08-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.30.741937 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Working memory has been considered a delay-dependent retention system, but variability in delay duration across species and tasks suggests that task-intrinsic factors may also contribute. Here, we investigated the effects of delay duration (75 s vs. 150 s) and task distance (0 m vs. 2 m) on working memory using a T-maze delayed alternation task with a movable home-cage apparatus in rats. At the 150-s delay, accuracy was 9% lower at 0 m than at 2 m (75% vs. 84%), with a similar numerical tendency observed at the 75-s delay (4% lower). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects of both task distance and delay duration, with no significant interaction (p = 0.217). Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that accuracy in the 0-m condition was significantly lower at 150 s than at 75 s (adjusted p = 0.038). At the 150-s delay, accuracy was also significantly lower in the 0-m condition than in the 2-m condition (adjusted p = 0.019). These results suggest that working memory retention is influenced not only by temporal constraints but also by task-intrinsic factors such as task distance, with the observed effects appearing independent and consistent with a two-factor framework.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.