Back

Effects of transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation to human lateral geniculate nucleus on visual perception and steady-state visual evoked potentials

Scott, M. T. W.; Limon, P. N.; Mohammadjavadi, M.; Kop, B. R.; Chen, N.-F.; Feredoes, E. A.; Vildavski, V.; Popelka, G. R.; Norcia, A. M.; Butts Pauly, K.; Ash, R. T.

2026-08-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.30.741804 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is an emerging tool to non-invasively modulate neural activity in deep brain areas. A key need in accelerating TUS into cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychiatry is to better understand how different sonication parameters relate to neuromodulatory effects. Here we assess the role of pulse repetition frequency (PRF), a key TUS parameter thought to determine the relative contribution of molecular displacement and acoustic radiation force effects on neural tissue using the human subcortical visual pathway as a testbed. We combined frequency-tagged steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) measures of contrast-response with contrast increment detection psychophysics as neural and behavioral readouts of visual pathway function. We used structural MRIs and acoustic simulations to target the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Concurrent with visual stimulus presentation, the left LGN or a more superficial control site were stimulated with a neuronavigated depth-steerable 4-element TUS transducer at a range of PRFs with 68 W/cm2 free-water ISPPA, and a 10% duty cycle. An effective white-noise auditory mask blinded participants to stimulation conditions. Recordings from 25 neurotypical participants failed to detect any impact of TUS on SSVEP response amplitude, SSVEP response latency, or perceptual behavior. Analysis of simulations generated from the measured transducer positions grant reasonably high confidence that the LGN was within the TUS focus in most participants, with no correlation between targeting accuracy and changes in activity during TUS. Our results provide a cautionary note about the effect size of neuronavigated TUS for online causal manipulations in cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.