Oral anticoagulation registry in patients with atrial fibrillation treated in Primary Care in clinical practice. The RACOVIR Study.
Polo Garcia, J.; Mico Perez, R. M.; Garcia Gabriel, E.; Romero Vigara, J. C.; Segura Fragoso, A.; Garcia Lerin, A.; Kopytina, V.; Santos Altozano, C.
Show abstract
Objectives: To assess how patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving oral anticoagulants are managed in routine primary care practice in Spain. Methods: This observational, descriptive study included patients with NVAF treated with oral anticoagulants for at least 6 months before enrolment and managed in primary care settings in Spain. The Barthel and ACTS questionnaires were administered to evaluate functional autonomy and treatment satisfaction, respectively. Results: A total of 1,901 patients were included: 428 received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and 1,473 direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Compared with patients receiving DOACs, those treated with VKAs were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of more hypertension. Mean treatment duration was 7.6 years for VKAs and 3.8 years for DOACs. Among patients receiving VKAs, 56.2% and 59.0% achieved good anticoagulation control according to the direct and Rosendaal methods, respectively. Patients in the DOAC group reported greater satisfaction across several domains, including perceived treatment benefits, lower impact on daily life, and overall positive treatment effect. Event incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) were higher with DOACs than with VKAs for stroke (1.75; 95% CI 1.05-2.92), ischemic stroke (1.78; 95% CI 1.06-3.00), acute myocardial infarction (1.64; 95% CI 0.97-2.79), and major bleeding (3.68; 95% CI 1.81-7.46). Conclusions: In routine primary care practice in Spain, patient profiles and treatment duration varied by oral anticoagulant type. These differences may partly explain the higher rates of stroke and major bleeding observed with DOACs versus VKAs, despite greater treatment satisfaction among patients receiving DOACs.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex and racial differences in cardiovascular disease risk in patients with atrial fibrillation 94%
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 93%
- Stent For Life Initiative in Portugal: progress through years and Covid-19 Impact 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 93%
- Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation among Cancer Patients: Utilization Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes 92%
- Incidence and outcomes of unstable angina in patients with low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I values -- A substudy of the RACE-IT trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anticoagulation trends in adults aged 65 and over with atrial fibrillation; a cohort study 94%
- OpenSAFELY: impact of national guidance on switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in early phase of COVID-19 pandemic in England 94%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is Catheter Ablation Associated with Preservation of Cognitive Function? An Analysis From the SAGE-AF Observational Cohort Study 93%
- Early and long-term risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation after transient ischemic attack 93%
- Smoking does not alter treatment effect of intravenous thrombolysis in mild to moderate acute ischemic stroke; a Dutch String-of-Pearls Institute (PSI) Stroke Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nimodipine-Associated Standard Dose Reductions and Neurologic Outcomes After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Era of Pharmacogenomics 90%
- New genetic variants associated with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and treated with clopidogrel and aspirin 89%
- Implementation of Pre-emptive Pharmacogenomics Testing in Outpatient Clinics in Asia (IMPT study) 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.