Taxonomic vs. Functional Diversity for the Impact Assessment of Offshore Oil & Gas Activities: An Exploratory Study on Benthic Prokaryotes
Bagi, A.; Lanzen, A.; Hestetun, J. T.; Dahlgren, T. G.; Larsen, A.; Brandt, M. I.
Show abstract
Improving environmental management in the offshore Oil & Gas sector requires approaches that capture the ecosystem services (ES) provided by marine sediments, particularly their roles in carbon and nutrient cycling. Microbial communities are central to these processes, and molecular tools offer new opportunities to assess their functional diversity. To explore how different sequencing approaches inform environmental impact assessment, we compared taxonomic and functional prediction based on 16S metabarcoding, shotgun metagenomics and messenger RNA-based metatranscriptomics, targeting prokaryotic communities. Our aims were to evaluate the ability of each approach to detect impact and to determine how well they captured functions relevant to ES. All approaches revealed clear differences in community composition between impacted and non-impacted sediments at both taxonomic and functional levels, with impact significantly associated with hydrocarbon and barium content. Functional inventories showed substantial overlap across the three approaches, and 48-55 ES-related processes were detectable in all datasets. While metagenomics provided the strongest statistical discrimination between impact groups, metatranscriptomics resolved the actively expressed pathways underpinning ES, yielding the most biologically meaningful functional profiles despite its lower statistical power. All approaches indicated that Oil & Gas activity drives shift towards anaerobic, hydrocarbon-degrading, and sulfur-respiring microbial communities, with hydrocarbon degradation, sulfur cycling, and metal detoxification being the dominant ES processes in impacted sediments. Metabarcoding was confirmed as a cost-effective option for impact assessment when focused on taxonomic composition. However, functional prediction from metabarcoding data proved less reliable, as several ES showed contrasting associations to impact category between metabarcoding and shotgun sequencing approaches.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nitrite accumulation and the associated anammox bacteria niche partitioning in marine sediments 96%
- Ocean-wide comparisons of mesopelagic planktonic community structures 96%
- Beyond the limits of the unassigned protist microbiome: inferring large-scale spatio-temporal patterns of marine parasites 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anaerobic microbial degradation of protein and lipid macromolecules in subarctic marine sediment 98%
- Microbial community and geochemical analyses of trans-trench sediments for understanding the roles of hadal environments 97%
- Time-series transcriptomics from cold, oxic subseafloor crustal fluids reveals a motile, mixotrophic microbial community 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Competition-cooperation in the chemoautotrophic ecosystem of Movile Cave - first metagenomic approach on sediments 98%
- Microbiome of the Black Sea water column analyzed by genome centric metagenomics 96%
- The economical lifestyle of CPR bacteria in groundwater allows little preference for environmental drivers 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating the Cyc2 neutrophilic Fe oxidation pathway using meta-omics of Zetaproteobacteria iron mats at marine hydrothermal vents 96%
- Press disturbance unveils different community structure, function and assembly of bacterial taxa and functional genes in mesocosm-scale bioreactors 96%
- Metabolic diversity and aero-tolerance in anammox bacteria from geochemically distinct aquifers 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.