Back

The School-age Asthma Prognosis Score (SAPS): development and external validation in two European cohorts

Makhoul, R.; Goutaki, M.; Romero, F.; Sasaki, M.; Hansen, G.; Heer, P.; Kopp, M. V.; Latzin, P.; Regamey, N.; Schaub, B.; Seidl, E.; Spycher, B. D.; Kuehni, C. E.

2026-08-04 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.07.29.26359237 medRxiv
Show abstract

Prediction models for asthma remission in school-age are lacking, limiting clinicians' ability to tailor follow-up. Most prediction tools focus on pre-school diagnosis or require lung function testing. We developed and validated a simple, history-based clinical prediction tool for asthma remission. We analyzed prospective data from the Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort (SPAC), including 1860 children (aged 5-16 years) with physician-diagnosed asthma. We derived asthma remission predictors from parental questionnaires capturing demographics, symptoms, triggers, and family history. We defined clinical remission at 2-3 years following asthma diagnosis, as absence of wheeze and inhaler use during the past 12 months. We developed the model using LASSO regression with multiple imputations for missing data, and assessed its performance by area under the curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, and calibration plots. We then derived a simplified score and validated it in the German All-Age Asthma Cohort (ALLIANCE). From 12 candidate variables, the final score retained: sex, wheeze frequency, night-time awakening, exercise-induced wheeze, pollen-triggered wheeze, animal-triggered wheeze, maternal asthma, and paternal asthma. The score demonstrated moderate discrimination in the development cohort (AUC 0.71) and maintained discriminative ability in the external validation (AUC 0.71). This practical, prognostic tool for asthma remission based only on clinical history, allows clinicians to identify children who have lower chances for remission, enabling their closer monitoring.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.