Back

Reducing the Burden of Hypoglycemia: FLO23011 Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes and Identifies Glycemic Predictors of Treatment Success

Russell-Jones, D.; Meehan, E.; Smout, V.; Roy, S.; Frost, W.; Young, T. M.; Bartlett, D. B.

2026-07-31 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.07.29.26359225 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to hypoglycemia recovery with FLO23011, a glucose/beta-hydroxybutyrate Multi-Energy Substrate for Hypoglycemia (MESH) treatment, versus standard glucose gel in adults with type 1 diabetes, and to explore associations between by continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and perceived and objective treatment response. Research Design and Methods In a randomized, open-label, crossover study, 12 adults with type 1 diabetes used either FLO23011 or glucose gel to treat hypoglycemia during two 6-week periods, with continuous glucose monitoring throughout. PROs were assessed using 14-domain questionnaires and exit interviews. CGM analyses from a broader discovery analysis examined patient-relevant recovery signals: glucose-band exposure versus psychological PRO scores, and baseline glycemic variability versus time-in-range response. Results FLO23011 was rated more favorably than glucose gel in 13/14 domains, with statistically significant in 10. Differences included speed of action (8.0 vs. 7.3; P = 0.025), after-effects reduction (8.0 vs. 6.2; P = 0.014), ease-of-use (8.9 vs. 4.9; P = 0.002), and overall management ability (8.5 vs. 7.4; P = 0.019). Interviews described faster cognitive recovery, reduced disruption, and greater confidence. Reduced Level 1 hypoglycemia exposure was associated with higher reduced-worry and management-ability ratings (n=5; {rho} = 0.90; P = 0.037). Higher baseline coefficient of variation was associated with greater time-in-range improvement with FLO23011 (n=9; {rho} = 0.917; P = 0.0005). Conclusions FLO23011 showed more favorable patient-reported recovery than glucose gel. Initial CGM-PRO analyses findings suggest perceived benefit may align with reduced Level 1 hypoglycemia, while baseline variability may identify greater objective response. Results support integrating patient-reported and glycemic outcomes to evaluate hypoglycemia treatments, warranting confirmation in larger blinded studies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.