Back

4D Biomimetic Morphing Hydrogel Scaffold via Biaxial Gradient Programming

Ding, A.; Gasvoda, K. L.; Alsberg, E.

2026-07-29 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.28.741270 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Four-dimensional (4D) materials incorporating functional gradient designs offer a powerful platform for engineering dynamic structures capable of programmed shape transformations in response to environmental stimuli. However, most gradient-based 4D systems rely on uniaxial gradients, which typically generate simple, symmetric deformations with uniform curvature, limiting their ability to recreate biomimetic architectures that require spatially coordinated morphogenesis. Here, we report a biaxial gradient-engineered 4D hydrogel system capable of programmable, non-uniform shape morphing within a single construct. A one-step photocrosslinking strategy integrates vertical light attenuation and horizontal grayscale photomask patterning to establish orthogonal crosslinking gradients along two directions, producing spatially heterogeneous swelling stresses that drive controlled multi-directional deformation. The resulting hydrogels exhibit tunable swelling and mechanical properties, enabling precise regulation of curvature distribution and shape transformation. This biaxial gradient platform generates diverse biomimetic architectures, including swan-neck, fiddlehead fern, sea star, and Euonymus europaeus-like structures. Importantly, the system supports cell-laden biofabrication, where human mesenchymal stem cell-encapsulated constructs maintain high viability and undergo chondrogenic differentiation while preserving programmed morphologies. This work establishes biaxial gradient-programmed 4D hydrogels as a robust strategy for integrating morphogenesis with tissue formation, advancing biomimetic biofabrication and morphogenetic tissue engineering.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.