Back

A panel of biologically contained orthoebolaviruses for the screening of broad-spectrum antivirals

Verlinden, J.; Stroobants, J.; Nonay, J. S.; Willems, C.; Govaerts, K.; Van Holm, B.; Chiu, W.; Schepers, J.; Francken, T.; Lemmens, V.; Vermeire, K.; Vanmechelen, B.

2026-07-31 microbiology
10.64898/2026.07.28.741243 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Filoviruses, particularly those of the Orthoebolavirus genus, pose ongoing public health threats due to their increasing frequency and geographic spread. However, research has been impeded by the biosafety level 4 classification of filoviruses. We previously reported the generation of biologically contained Ebola, Marburg and Sudan virus as lower biosafety level-compatible filovirus systems. In the present study, we expanded this repertoire to include biologically contained Tai Forest, Bundibugyo and Reston virus, thereby creating a near-complete toolkit for currently recognized human-relevant orthoebolaviruses. VP30-deficient viruses were generated with matching VP30 expressing cell lines. More specifically, we developed and optimized a dual-reporter system in VeroE6, Huh-7 and A549 cells, combining a virus-encoded enhanced green fluorescent protein reporter as readout for viral replication with a stably cellular-expressed nuclear mCherry marker for cytotoxicity assessment. Next, we screened two repurposing-oriented compound libraries comprising 640 small molecules against Tai Forest, Bundibugyo and Sudan virus, and subsequently cross-validated against Reston and Ebola virus. This approach identified multiple candidates with broad-spectrum activity across orthoebolaviruses, while also revealing virus-specific antivirals, with robust activity observed in both primate- and human-derived cell lines. Together, this work establishes a versatile and experimentally tractable lower biosafety level-compatible platform for the study of human-relevant orthoebolaviruses and the systematic discovery of broad-spectrum antiviral countermeasures against filoviruses.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.