Accurate Hepatic Fat Fraction Quantification Across Body Sizes Using Photon-Counting CT
Li, X.; Kallman, C.; Zhang, D.; Guo, C.; Zhou, Y.
Show abstract
Objective: To identify common photon-counting CT (PCCT) virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) settings for accurate hepatic fat fraction (FF) quantification across different body sizes, including large body habitus. Methods: Six non-iodinated fat lesions (FF 5%-40%) were embedded in anthropomorphic liver phantoms representing medium-sized (25x32.5 cm^2) and large (31x39 cm^2) abdomens. Phantoms were scanned on a PCCT system (NAEOTOM Alpha) at 120 and 140 kV. CT numbers were measured in VMIs at 40-190 keV in 1-keV increments. Linear regression between the ground-truth FF and measured Hounsfield units (HU) was used to estimate FF. Common optimal VMI settings yielding the minimum relative root-mean-square error (rRMSE) in both phantoms were identified. Results: A single VMI setting of 70 keV at 140 kV demonstrated the best overall performance across body sizes, with FF (%) = -0.689HU + 36.51 (R^2 > 0.996), achieving rRMSE [≤]3.4% and absolute RMSE [≤]0.7% in both phantoms. Robust performance (rRMSE [≤] 5%) was consistently maintained across 69-71 keV using identical calibration parameters for both phantoms. These results represented a substantial improvement over previously reported dual-energy CT (DECT) performance, while enabling accurate quantification on PCCT at radiation doses approximately 40% lower than those used in prior DECT protocols. Conclusion: PCCT enables accurate and robust hepatic fat fraction quantification independent of body size. A single protocol at 140 kV with VMIs of 69-71 keV consistently achieved low quantification errors, demonstrating strong potential for opportunistic liver fat assessment using PCCT, especially in obese patients.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm 97%
- Reproducible spectral CT thermometry with liver-mimicking phantoms for image-guided thermal ablation 95%
- Contrast-enhanced photon-counting micro-CT of tumor xenograft models 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 94%
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 92%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low dose quantitative spectral imaging 98%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 93%
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pancreas MRI segmentation into head, body, and tail enables regional quantitative analysis of heterogeneous disease 92%
- Correction of Artifacts Induced by B0 Inhomogeneities in Breast MRI using Reduced Field-of-View Echo-Planar Imaging and Enhanced Reverse Polarity Gradient Method 92%
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Spectral Registration Using Deep Learning 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.