Back

Accurate Hepatic Fat Fraction Quantification Across Body Sizes Using Photon-Counting CT

Li, X.; Kallman, C.; Zhang, D.; Guo, C.; Zhou, Y.

2026-07-30 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.07.28.26359152 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To identify common photon-counting CT (PCCT) virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) settings for accurate hepatic fat fraction (FF) quantification across different body sizes, including large body habitus. Methods: Six non-iodinated fat lesions (FF 5%-40%) were embedded in anthropomorphic liver phantoms representing medium-sized (25x32.5 cm^2) and large (31x39 cm^2) abdomens. Phantoms were scanned on a PCCT system (NAEOTOM Alpha) at 120 and 140 kV. CT numbers were measured in VMIs at 40-190 keV in 1-keV increments. Linear regression between the ground-truth FF and measured Hounsfield units (HU) was used to estimate FF. Common optimal VMI settings yielding the minimum relative root-mean-square error (rRMSE) in both phantoms were identified. Results: A single VMI setting of 70 keV at 140 kV demonstrated the best overall performance across body sizes, with FF (%) = -0.689HU + 36.51 (R^2 > 0.996), achieving rRMSE [≤]3.4% and absolute RMSE [≤]0.7% in both phantoms. Robust performance (rRMSE [≤] 5%) was consistently maintained across 69-71 keV using identical calibration parameters for both phantoms. These results represented a substantial improvement over previously reported dual-energy CT (DECT) performance, while enabling accurate quantification on PCCT at radiation doses approximately 40% lower than those used in prior DECT protocols. Conclusion: PCCT enables accurate and robust hepatic fat fraction quantification independent of body size. A single protocol at 140 kV with VMIs of 69-71 keV consistently achieved low quantification errors, demonstrating strong potential for opportunistic liver fat assessment using PCCT, especially in obese patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.