Chest Radiography AI Concordance and Lung Cancer Linkage in a Large Health Check-up Cohort
Fujita, Y.; Saito, S.; Yagishita, S.; Araya, J.; Nakagawa, R.
Show abstract
Purpose To evaluate the implementation characteristics of a commercially available chest radiography artificial intelligence (AI) system in a large real-world health check-up cohort using workflow-level, lesion-specific, and exploratory retrospective lung cancer case analyses. Methods This retrospective single-centre study included 298,991 consecutive health check-up chest radiographs from 114,866 individuals obtained between 2019 and 2023 and interpreted under routine double reading by board-certified radiologists. A commercially available AI system was evaluated using two prespecified thresholds: positivity in any of ten findings for the all-score analysis and positivity for nodule or mass for the nodule-focused analysis, both at a manufacturer-recommended score threshold of 15. Because routine radiologist judgement rather than universal CT or pathologic verification served as the reference framework, the primary analyses were interpreted as radiologist-referenced operational concordance analyses. Results Radiologist-referenced sensitivity and specificity were 72.0% and 79.6%, respectively, in the all-score analysis and 87.1% and 91.8%, respectively, in the nodule-focused analysis. Negative predictive values were 99.0% and 100.0%, respectively. Among 48 histopathologically confirmed lung cancer cases, retrospective timeline analyses showed earlier AI positivity than routine radiologist positivity in a subset of cases. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory observations and do not establish prospective clinical benefit. Conclusion In a large health check-up cohort, chest radiography AI demonstrated stable concordance with routine radiologist judgement and high sensitivity for radiologist-reported pulmonary nodules and masses. Exploratory retrospective analyses showed earlier AI positivity in a subset of histopathologically confirmed lung cancer cases, supporting further prospective evaluation of AI-assisted health check-up workflows.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Monocyte and neutrophil levels are potentially linked to progression to IPF for patients with indeterminate UIP CT pattern 88%
- Remote-management of COPD: Evaluating Implementation of Digital Innovation to Enable Routine Care (RECEIVER) – Protocol for a feasibility and service adoption observational cohort study 87%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Radiomics analysis to predict pulmonary nodule malignancy using machine learning approaches 93%
- Post-viral parenchymal lung disease following COVID-19 and viral pneumonitis hospitalisation: A systematic review and meta-analysis 89%
- Multicentre evaluation of two multiplex PCR platforms for the rapid microbiological investigation of nosocomial pneumonia in UK ICUs: the INHALE WP1 study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 92%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 92%
- Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Normal Forced Vital Capacity Does Not Reliably or Equitably Exclude Restriction 91%
- Clinical utility of home versus hospital spirometry in fibrotic ILD: evaluation following INJUSTIS interim analysis 89%
- Multiple breath-washout for pulmonary function assessment in young childhood cancer survivors: a multicenter study 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.