Phase One Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
Farrow, E.; Coxon-Meggy, A.; Knight, L.; Bissett, I.; Bordeianou, L.; Boutros, M.; Burch, J.; Christensen, P.; Corrigan, N.; Croft, J.; Demian, M.; Dhadlie, S.; Emmertsen, K. J.; Gordon, K.; Sarah Faris-Sabboobeh, S.; Fearnhead, N.; Flavio FioreJr, J.; Keane, C.; Knowles, C.; Lloydwin, C.; Marinello, F.; Meggy, A.; Mohan, H.; Ng, K.-S.; Oliveira, C. L. P.; Oliveira, L.; Quyn, A.; Rose, A.; Stocken, D.; Warwick, A.; White, J.; Cornish, J.
Show abstract
Background The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score is an internationally validated instrument for identifying bowel dysfunction following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Although widely used, it has been shown to have limited sensitivity for capturing the impact of LARS on daily-life and response to treatment. We have therefore developed a novel patient-reported outcome measure (PROM): the LARS Impact and Consequences Assessment Tool (LARS-ICAT). Methods Initial development of LARS-ICAT followed a five-stage process following established PROM development guidance. Stage one established the conceptual foundation through previously published Delphi consensus. Stage two involved item generation, followed by evaluation of content validity through patient focus groups (n=11) in stage three. Stage four comprised iterative expert review and refinement through clinical consensus with patient involvement. Stage five involved cognitive interviews with patients conducted across five rounds (n=23). Results Several items identified through the Delphi consensus were reworded as they included multiple concepts. A one-month recall period was selected, with six and four response options for symptom and consequence items respectively. Additional consequence items, including impact on sleep and transport use, were incorporated. Focus groups and clinicians emphasised the importance of capturing individual symptom burden, leading to the addition of symptom bother scales. These iterative refinements culminated in LARS-ICAT v2.6. Conclusions LARS-ICAT is a novel PROM designed to assess symptom burden and treatment response in LARS. Future studies will assess its psychometric properties. Once validated, LARS-ICAT will provide a comprehensive, patient-centred assessment of LARS, enhancing our ability to manage this challenging condition.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Attributing non-specific symptoms to cancer in general practice: a scoping review 93%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 93%
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 94%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 94%
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ensuring a successful transition from Pap to HPV-based primary screening in Canada: a study protocol to investigate the psychosocial correlates of women’s screening intentions 89%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 89%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The modified COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm) patient-reported outcome measure for Long Covid or Post-COVID syndrome 94%
- The COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRS): application and psychometric analysis in a post-COVID-19 syndrome cohort 93%
- Evaluation Of A New “All In One” Sars-Cov-2 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Test And Self-Test: Diagnostic Performance And Usability On Child And Adult Population 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 95%
- Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy: Considerations from an OBGYN Perspective 92%
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.