It Takes Two to Tango: Supporting Public Health Leaders to Effectively Engage Political Leadership During Crises
Buissonniere, M.; Guillen, E.; McClelland, A.; Jashinsky, K.; Abraham, J.
Show abstract
Nineteen individuals with diverse public health leadership experience across different levels and domains, from countries with varying levels of economic development, and who have direct involvement in crises were interviewed. A concise literature review was conducted, examining the intersection of politics and public health leadership, as well as a brief review of relevant existing leadership courses, training programs, and fellowships. The interviews were transcribed in full, anonymized, coded (total 1104 coded excerpts, 762 discrete excerpts), and used as the basis for analyzing findings. Our research identified four thematic areas at the intersection of public health and political leadership in public health crises: attributes and skills; role of and threshold for political engagement; structural elements underpinning effective public health response; and modalities for building public health leadership. Public health leaders need to learn core skills, especially effective communication, diplomacy, and advocacy, and cultivate key attributes, especially integrity and humility, that support their ability to engage with political decision makers. Political leaders need to contribute productively ways, and at the appropriate time, to ensure societal cohesion and facilitate a well-resourced multisectoral response with public health at its core. Pre-established relationships and coordination mechanisms can play a supporting and productive role when crises strike. Strategies that incorporate experiential learning, peer collaboration, and mentorship are central to building the skills public health leaders need to succeed in crises. Many tangible steps can be taken to foster and support public health leadership including: integrating the political dimensions of public health into public health education; tailoring public health trainings to include practical skills such as stakeholder engagement, effective communication, negotiation, policy advocacy, and community engagement; creating supportive ecosystems through peer, mentor, and fellowship approaches; and advocating for strengthening the structural interface between politics and public health.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities 94%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization of Facility-Based Essential Maternal and Child Health Services in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia 92%
- Health System Resilience-enhancing Strategies for Managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concerns (PHEIC): Success and Challenges A Systematic Review Protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 92%
- Leadership and Governance, Financing, and Coordination and their Impact on the Operationalization of Health Interventions in the Humanitarian-Development Nexus in South Sudan 92%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 96%
- How does public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors correlate in relation to COVID-19? A community-based cross-sectional study in Nepal 90%
- A Development and Implementation of a Preconception Counseling Program for Black Women and Men in the Southeastern United States: A Pilot Protocol 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 93%
- Progress in Epidemic Ready Primary Health Care: Early Pilot Results from Four African Countries (Ethiopia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Uganda), December 2023 – October 2024 93%
- Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Modelling Efforts For Policy Decision-Making In Lower- And Middle-Income Countries 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.