Computationally guided design of a metastasis-on-a-chip platform for quantitative evaluation of chemotactic cues in developmental cancers
Murphy, C.; Jarc, L.; Cadavere, A.; Cioffi, E.; Badiola-Mateos, M.; Fernandez, D.; Gomez-Jimenez, N.; Mora, J.; Samitier, J.; Villasante, A.
Show abstract
Metastatic dissemination is initiated by tumor cells interpreting spatially organized biochemical and biophysical cues that remain difficult to reproduce using conventional migration assays. Here, we developed a computationally guided metastasis-on-a-chip (MET-on-a-chip) platform based on the concept of the Minimally Functional Unit (MFU), in which only the biological components required to answer a defined experimental question are incorporated. The platform consists of two independent culture chambers connected through an array of confined microchannels that permits diffusion of soluble factors while constraining tumor cell migration. Rather than relying on empirical optimization, finite-element COMSOL simulations were first used to predict molecular transport, define growth factor loading conditions, identify biologically relevant exposure regions, and guide the rational design of the microfluidic assay. Computational predictions were experimentally validated using 70-kDa FITC-dextran diffusion and VEGF release studies, confirming the formation of stable spatial concentration gradients across the microfluidic platform. The simulations further demonstrated that both growth factor loading and cell positioning relative to the predicted gradients critically influenced assay performance, leading to the optimization of the platform through spatial reconfiguration of the tumor compartment. Using the optimized configuration, we compared the migratory responses of neuroblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, and osteosarcoma cells to vascular (VEGF-A165) and lymphatic (VEGF-C) chemotactic cues. VEGF-C significantly increased migration through the microchannel array in Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma cells, whereas VEGF-A165 produced no significant effect. In contrast, neuroblastoma cells exhibited minimal migration under either condition, revealing tumor-specific differences in responsiveness to VEGF signaling. Together, these findings establish a computationally guided workflow for the rational design of metastasis-on-a-chip assays, in which predictive modeling informs experimental design before biological validation. By substantially reducing empirical trial-and-error while enabling quantitative control over growth factor exposure, this strategy provides a robust framework for developing minimally functional microphysiological systems capable of dissecting individual steps of the metastatic cascade under experimentally defined conditions. Translational Impact StatementMetastatic dissemination remains one of the greatest clinical challenges in pediatric oncology, yet experimental models capable of quantitatively evaluating early migratory events remain limited. The computationally guided MET-on-a-Chip workflow presented here provides a human-relevant platform in which soluble microenvironmental cues can be systematically investigated under controlled and predictive conditions. Although demonstrated here using VEGF-A165 and VEGF-C, the platform can be readily adapted to study virtually any chemotactic factor, cytokine, extracellular vesicle population, or therapeutic candidate involved in metastatic dissemination. The modular MFU design allows biological complexity to be incorporated progressively as dictated by the scientific question, providing a flexible framework for future applications. In the longer term, this workflow could be combined with patient-derived tumor cells, organoids, or biopsy material to investigate patient-specific metastatic behavior and evaluate anti-metastatic therapeutic strategies in a personalized setting. Beyond identifying pro-migratory signaling pathways, the platform may serve as a preclinical tool to prioritize compounds capable of preventing tumor cell dissemination before evaluation in more complex animal models or clinical studies.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Sacrificial 3D Printed Vessel-on-Chip Demonstrates a Versatile Approach to Model Connective Tissue Pathology 96%
- A versatile microfluidic extrusion-based hydrogel platform for self-organization and long-term maintenance of engineered 3D lymphatic endothelium 96%
- The Modular μSiM: a Mass Produced, Rapidly Assembled, and Reconfigurable Platform for the Study of Barrier Tissue Models In Vitro 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Luminal Flow Actuation Generates Coupled Shear and Strain in a Microvessel-on-Chip 96%
- Embolization-on-a-chip: Novel Vascularized Liver Tumor Model for Evaluation of Cellular and Cytokine Response to Embolic Agents 96%
- Local extensional flows promote long-range fiber alignment in 3D collagen hydrogels 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An omentum-inspired 3D PEG hydrogel for identifying ECM drivers of drug resistant ovarian cancer 94%
- Parallel on-chip micropipettes enabling quantitative multiplexed characterization of vesicle mechanics and cell aggregates rheology 94%
- Vertically Integrated System for Tracking and Assessing cell-cycle aware phenotypes under confinement 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.