Comparative Evaluation of Commercial Gradient Diffusion and Disk Diffusion Tests for Aztreonam-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing

BackgroundAztreonam-avibactam (AZA) is a recently approved agent active against metallo-{beta}-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. However, independent evaluations of commercially available antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) products remain limited. MethodsWe evaluated 56 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates using four newly available AZA AST products, including two gradient diffusion (bioMerieux Etest; Liofilchem MIC Test Strip) and two disk diffusion (Hardy, Liofilchem) tests across three Mueller-Hinton agar manufacturers at two independent clinical laboratories. A diverse isolate collection enriched for nonsusceptible and breakpoint-adjacent MICs was used to rigorously assess categorical agreement. Broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), error rates, and reproducibility were analyzed. ResultsAll four commercial AST products demonstrated acceptable analytical performance compared with reference BMD. Gradient diffusion demonstrated high EA (bioMerieux 94.3%, Liofilchem 90.5%), whereas CA ranged from 83.3% to 89.0% across all four products. Minor errors accounted for all categorical discrepancies, and occurred almost exclusively among breakpoint-adjacent isolates. Media-related variability was modest, and quality control performance was generally high, with strong within-site precision and consistent performance across laboratories. ConclusionsThis study provides the first comprehensive head-to-head comparison of commercial AZA susceptibility testing products and supports their implementation in clinical microbiology laboratories.