Back

Invasiveness Screening Kit (ISK) v3: an integrated multilingual decision-support platform for non-native species risk identification

Vilizzi, L.; Al-Marhoun, A.

2026-07-28 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.24.740490 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Risk identification of non-native species is widely used to support prioritization, early warning, horizon scanning and management decisions. Over the past two decades, the Invasiveness Screening Kit (ISK) framework of decision-support tools has developed through aquatic, terrestrial animal and terrestrial plant applications, but until now these toolkits have been distributed and used as separate software environments. ISK v3 provides a single integrated Microsoft Excel/Visual Basic for Applications platform for the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK), Terrestrial Animal Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (TAS-ISK) and Terrestrial Plant Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (TPS-ISK). It preserves the established questionnaires, scoring logic and multilingual implementation of the three toolkits within a single integrated interface, while introducing improved harmonized database workflows, screening record management, taxonomic verification, threshold handling with built-in calibration, risk summaries, reporting, merging and export functions as well as controlled access to separate Excel instances. The platform supports 31 languages, toolkit-specific databases, conversion of compatible v2 databases, import of legacy aquatic first-generation ISK databases into AS-ISK, online verification through major taxonomic and biodiversity data resources, and use of a global a priori categorization dataset for calibration. ISK v3 preserves the reproducible screening structure of the three toolkits while improving consistency, transparency and traceability in non-native species risk identification and reducing fragmentation across toolkits. It provides a common platform for researchers, managers and institutions applying risk identification workflows across aquatic, terrestrial animal and terrestrial plant taxa.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.