Preconception advice, care and services in the UK: who delivers what, where, how and to whom? A cross-sectional survey
Schoenaker, D.; Cassinelli, E.; Akagwu, O.; Lakhani, S.; Benton, M.; Blundell, L.; Brophy, S.; Currie, S.; Hall, J.; Hanley, S.; Maslin, K.; McGranahan, M.; McQuire, C.; Stephenson, J.; Tunn, R.; McGowan, L.
Show abstract
Objective: to describe the provision of preconception care across publicly funded or contracted health and social care settings in the UK. Design and setting: online cross-sectional survey conducted October-December 2025. Population: healthcare professionals delivering preconception care, recruited via professional organisations and networks. Methods: quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative free-text responses using inductive content analysis. Outcome measures: preconception care content, target population, frequency of provision, funding and commissioning models, and approaches for reporting and monitoring. Results: Eighty-seven healthcare professionals completed the survey. Most were women (89.3%), aged 41-60 (63.1%) and based in England (84.5%). Participants represented diverse roles, mainly obstetric/maternal-fetal specialists (23.0%), specialist nurses (16.0%), GPs and midwives (13.8% each). Preconception care primarily targeted women [≥]20 years (98.9%), with fewer targeting men and adolescents. Care was usually embedded within relevant consultations (69.4%), particularly contraception, medication and health condition reviews, and often a one-off interaction (75.3%). Content focused on condition-related management/medication (68.6%), folic acid (66.3%), risky behaviours (smoking, alcohol, illicit drugs) (40.7%), diet (37.2%) and weight (36.0%). Services were mostly not formally commissioned (62.4%), lacked financial incentives (84.7%) and had no audit/service evaluation requirements (81.2%). Conclusions: Preconception care in the UK is delivered by a wide range of healthcare professionals. Their engagement has improved considerably when compared with studies conducted over a decade ago, but preconception care remains fragmented, opportunistic and poorly supported by commissioning and system infrastructure. Strengthening integrated care pathways, funding mechanisms and use of standardised resources is essential to achieve consistent and equitable preconception care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 96%
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 95%
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 93%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 93%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 95%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 95%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives 95%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preconception indicators and associations with health outcomes reported in UK routine primary care data: a systematic review 97%
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.