Deep Learning for Individual-Level Classification of Schizophrenia Versus Healthy Controls from Trial-Level Auditory Oddball ERP Waveforms
Sheu, Y.-H.; Lin, Y.-T.; Holton, K. M.; Liu, C.-M.; Chien, Y.-L.; Liu, C.-C.; Hall, M.-H.; Hwu, H.-G.; Hsieh, M. H.
Show abstract
Machine learning approaches may support individual-level classification in psychiatry, but many EEG-based schizophrenia studies have relied on small samples or conventional summary features. We evaluated whether trial-level auditory oddball event-related potential (ERP) waveforms could support schizophrenia versus healthy-control classification using deep learning. The study included 258 patients with schizophrenia and 142 healthy controls. EEG recordings from an auditory duration oddball paradigm were segmented into -100 to 500 ms epochs, and trial-level mismatch waveforms were generated by subtracting each participant's mean standard response from accepted deviant trials. Models were trained using a fixed participant-level training, validation, and test split, with demographic residualization fit only in the training set. Five deep learning architectures were trained on full residualized ERP waveforms and compared with classical machine learning models trained on 18 conventional ERP summary features. Deep learning models achieved higher test set discrimination than classical feature-based models, with AUROC values ranging from 0.797 to 0.857 versus 0.705 to 0.720. Benchmark analyses suggested that performance depended on the combination of waveform-level input and deep learning architecture. These findings support trial-level auditory oddball ERP waveforms as promising classification inputs and candidate electrophysiological biomarkers of schizophrenia-related neural information processing.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal fusion of brain signals for robust prediction of psychosis transition 94%
- Altered Neural Processing in Middle Frontal Gyrus and Cerebellum During Temporal Recalibration of Action-Outcome Predictions in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders 92%
- Early visual processing as a marker of disease, not vulnerability: Event-related potential (ERP) evidence from 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, a population at high risk for schizophrenia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reassessing Asymmetry Reduction in Psychosis: Cingulate Folding and Gyrification Covariance in Patients with Auditory Hallucinations 93%
- A 10-Year Longitudinal Study of Brain Cortical Thickness in People with First-Episode Psychosis using Normative Models 93%
- Restoring Synaptic Balance in Schizophrenia: Insights from a thalamo-cortical conductance-based model. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Affinity Scores: An Individual-centric Fingerprinting Framework for Neuropsychiatric Disorders 94%
- Magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy increase frontal aperiodic activity 93%
- Electrophysiological network alterations in adults with copy number variants associated with high neurodevelopmental risk 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aberrant hierarchical prediction errors are associated with transition to psychosis: A computational single-trial analysis of the mismatch negativity 95%
- Volatility estimates increase choice switching and relate to prefrontal activity in schizophrenia 92%
- Auditory and Visual Thalamocortical Connectivity Alterations in Unmedicated People with Schizophrenia: An Individualized Sensory Thalamic Localization and Resting-State Functional Connectivity Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients Recovering from COVID-19 who Presented Anosmia During their Acute Episode have Behavioral, Functional, and Structural Brain Alterations 92%
- Multiscale criticality measures as general-purpose gauges of proper brain function 92%
- Sound perception in realistic surgery scenarios: Towards EEG-based auditory work strain measures for medical personnel. 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.