Development and Psychometric Validation of the Pelvic Dystonia Severity Scale (PDSS)
Siefferman, J.; Safroshkina, M.; Nazarova, I.; Zaznaev, A.; Hasan, S.
Show abstract
Background. Chronic pelvic pain with involuntary pelvic-floor hypertonicity is common, disabling, and inconsistently measured, and no validated condition-specific severity instrument exists. A refractory subset has been proposed to represent a focal dystonia of the pelvic musculature, termed pelvic dystonia. Purpose. To develop the Pelvic Dystonia Severity Scale (PDSS) and evaluate its measurement properties as a patient-reported measure of pelvic-pain symptom severity and burden, following the COSMIN guidelines. Methods. Cross-sectional study with a test-retest component in 102 adults from an outpatient multidisciplinary pain practice. We assessed data quality, structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and construct validity against the Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (GDS) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Because no validated diagnostic criteria exist, a clinician blinded to PDSS responses rated each participant for clinical signs of pelvic dystonia (present/possible/absent) as a provisional reference standard. Results. 100 of 102 participants (98%) returned complete data, with 0% item-level missing data. Factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure (single factor, 68.6% of variance; loadings 0.56-0.93), with high subscale intercorrelations (r = 0.81-0.97). Internal consistency (Cronbach's 0.810-0.924) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.857-0.953) were strong. Convergent validity was supported by correlations with GDS pelvic-region items (r = 0.56-0.68) and BPI severity (r = 0.44-0.55), and discriminant validity by weak correlations with anatomically remote regions (shoulder/arm r = 0.03-0.16). PDSS scores rose monotonically across blinded clinical-signs categories (absent 14.9, possible 32.7, present 52.0; Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001), discriminating signs-present from signs-absent participants with a very large effect (Hedges g = 2.19; ROC AUC = 0.92). Conclusion. The PDSS is a psychometrically robust, unidimensional measure of pelvic-pain symptom severity and burden with strong data quality, reliability, and construct validity. It is suitable for characterizing symptom severity and, pending responsiveness testing, for monitoring treatment. The dystonia interpretation of the underlying phenotype is discussed as a hypothesis for future neurophysiologic and longitudinal study.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Hypersensitivity Derived from Quantitative Sensory Testing Predicts Long-Term Pelvic Pain Outcome 93%
- Convergent validity of a person-dependent definition of a low back pain flare 92%
- Prism adaptation treatment for upper-limb Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: a double-blind randomized controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensory profiling in classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case-control study revealing pain characteristics, somatosensory changes, and impaired pain modulation 92%
- A shared genetic signature for common chronic pain conditions and its impact on biopsychosocial traits 91%
- Low somatosensory cortex excitability in the acute stage of low back pain causes chronic pain 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Myofascial Frequency Syndrome: A novel syndrome of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms associated with myofascial pelvic floor dysfunction 94%
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 94%
- Integrating Multidimensional Data Analytics for Precision Diagnosis of Chronic Low Back Pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scoping Review and Interpretation of Myofascial Pain/Fibromyalgia Syndrome: An Attempt to Assemble a Medical Puzzle 93%
- Restoration of normal central pain processing following manual therapy in nonspecific chronic neck pain 92%
- Incidence of Long-term Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Related to Pain and Other Symptoms: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.