Patterns of healthcare use in people with narcolepsy: a population-based cohort study in England
Strongman, H.; Belot, A.; Mistry, H.; Nolte, E.; Eriksson, S. H.; Miller, M. A.; Smith, I. E.; Warren-Gash, C.; Bhaskaran, K.
Show abstract
People with narcolepsy experience delays in diagnosis and inconsistent post-diagnosis care, but the pattern and scale of their healthcare use is poorly described. In this population-based cohort study, we used primary care and linked hospital activity data to compare healthcare use in people with narcolepsy (n=2,772) and a matched comparison group in England (n=13,860). Narcolepsy was defined by a first coded record in primary care or admitted care data between 02 January 1998 and 31 December 2019; this date was the index date for both groups. People with narcolepsy had approximately double the rate of healthcare use in the period from five years before to five years after the index date. Annually, this corresponded on average to an additional 1.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.0) outpatient events, 0.36 (95% CI 0.30-0.42) admitted patient care events, 0.25 (95% CI 0.22-0.29) Accident & Emergency events and 4.3 (95% CI 3.9-4.7) primary care events per person. Service use in all settings peaked at index and remained elevated for at least 15 years either side. The elevated rates of possible-sleep related outpatient events (respiratory, neurology paediatric, and ear nose & throat) peaked in the year including and after the index date, at 1.50 (95% CI 1.41-1.59); before declining to <0.5 visits per person-year after five years. Our findings of sustained elevated use of healthcare by people with narcolepsy across NHS settings may reflect diagnostic delay, comorbidities, and ongoing narcolepsy-related healthcare needs being met largely outside specialist sleep care, highlighting opportunities to improve healthcare services.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Are adversities and worries during the COVID-19 pandemic related to sleep quality? Longitudinal analyses of 48,000 UK adults 90%
- Home-EEG assessment of possible compensatory mechanisms for sleep disruption in highly irregular shift workers - The ANCHOR study 90%
- Healthcare presentations with self-harm and the association with COVID-19: an e-cohort whole-population-based study using individual-level linked routine electronic health records in Wales, UK, 2016 - March 2021 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and changes in diet, physical activity and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from eight longitudinal studies 89%
- Relation of severe COVID-19 in Scotland to transmission-related factors and risk conditions eligible for shielding support: REACT-SCOT case-control study 88%
- Determinants of pre-vaccination antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- RBDAct: Home screening of REM sleep behaviour disorder based on wrist actigraphy in Parkinson’s patients 90%
- Age-related differences in the association between REM sleep and the polygenic risk for Parkinson's disease 89%
- Increased numbers of CD4+ T-cells in hypocretin/orexin region of Narcolepsy Type 1 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Prokineticin System Is Downregulated in Idiopathic Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder: Evidence from Olfactory Neurons 91%
- The Development of Sleep/Wake Disruption and Cataplexy as Hypocretin/Orexin Neurons Degenerate in Male vs. Female Orexin/tTA; TetO-DTA Mice 91%
- A new incidence peak of childhood narcolepsy type 1 in 2013:a new perspective on the role of influenza virus? 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.