Self-powered electronics-free Wearable Disposable Electrotherapy (WDE) platform for accelerated wound healing
Belali Koochesfahani, M.; Donnery, K. V.; Senthil Kumar, A.; Bhuiyan, R.; Drumm, D. A.; Mirza, B.; Posada Perez, M.; Diaz Uraga, M. R.; Nunez Ponasso, G. C.; Makaroff, S.; FallahRad, M.; Bikson, M.
Show abstract
Electrical stimulation accelerates wound repair by modulating endogenous bioelectric signals that regulate inflammation, angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and cellular responses within the wound microenvironment. However, clinical translation has been hindered by cumbersome devices with procedures that disrupt standard wound-care workflows, direct electrode contact with the wound bed, and/or limited stimulation output. Wearable Disposable Electrotherapy (WDE) integrates an electronics-free printed electrochemical architecture into an mm-thick patch that looks and is applied like a conventional bandage. The device is self- powered and delivers a single electrotherapy dose simply by application to the skin. Device dose-control (electrochemical performance) and efficacy were evaluated in a full-thickness excisional wound model in rats, compared with a sham device and a conventional Constant Current (CC) stimulator. WDE or control treatments were applied daily from day 1 through day 13, with endpoint evaluation on day 14. WDE delivered electrical stimulation comparable to CC while reducing the time required to achieve 50% wound closure by 2.08 days ([~]29%) relative to sham treatment. Histological and immunofluorescence analyses at day 14 demonstrated enhanced tissue remodeling, including increased collagen deposition ([~]25%), tissue cellularity ([~]73%), myofibroblast-associated SMA expression ([~]2.6-fold), angiogenesis-associated CD31 expression ([~]2.0-fold), and increased expression of both M2- (CD206, [~]2.0-fold) and M1- associated (iNOS, [~]1.7-fold) markers compared with sham. A novel cellular-resolution dosimetry model, leveraging charge-based boundary element method accelerated with the fast multipole method (BEM-FMM), provides a biophysical framework linking electrical stimulation with wound microenvironment and tissue repair mechanisms. Together, these findings establish WDE as a practical bioelectric wound dressing that accelerates wound healing and tissue remodeling, with the simplicity and scalability of disposable bandages.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Noninvasive Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves using Temporally-Interfering Electrical Fields 94%
- A Truly Injectable Neural Stimulation Electrode Made from an In-Body Curing Polymer/Metal Composite 93%
- Assembled Cell-Decorated Collagen (AC-DC) bioprinted implants mimic musculoskeletal tissue properties and promote functional recovery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Daily electric field treatment improves functional outcomes after thoracic contusion spinal cord injury in rats 95%
- A biodegradable and restorative peripheral neural interface for the interrogation of neuropathic injuries 95%
- Ultraconformable cuff implants for long-term bidirectional interfacing of peripheral nerves at sub-nerve resolutions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative proteomic analysis of skin wound healing responses to biomaterial treatments identifies key pathways which govern differential regenerative outcomes 93%
- Planar Amorphous Silicon Carbide Microelectrode Arrays for Chronic Recording in Rat Motor Cortex 93%
- In vivo spatiotemporal dynamics of astrocyte reactivity following neural electrode implantation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Laser-driven Wireless Deep Brain Stimulation using Temporal Interference and Organic Electrolytic Photocapacitors 93%
- Potential of Photoelectric Stimulation with Ultrasmall Carbon Electrode on Neural Tissue: New Directions in Neuromodulation Technology Development 93%
- Customizing Multifunctional Neural Interfaces through Thermal Drawing Process 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.