Impact of Cardiomyopathy and Arrhythmia Genetic Testing on Clinical Management Decisions
Morales, A.; Ting, Y.-L.; Bucknor, B.; Chahal, A. A.; Higgs, E.; Judge, D.; Owens, A. T.; Wang, J.; Alkhayat, M.; Barker, N.; Betts, M. N.; Chowns, J.; Eberly, R. M.; Esplin, E. D.; Hoffman-Andrews, L.; Koduri, A.; Nair, A. P.; Padmanabhan, A.; Vedantham, V.; Wojciak, J.; McNally, E. M.
Show abstract
Genetic testing for cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia (CM/ARRH) provides diagnostic information and informs screening for at-risk relatives. Clinical guidelines recommend genetic testing for these conditions; however, data on how genetic test results influence clinical management recommendations are limited. Here, we determined the frequency of cardiologist-recommended management changes for patients following CM/ARRH genetic testing. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients referred for multigene panel testing between April 2016 and April 2024. Genetically-experienced cardiologists at multicenter academic clinical practices were recruited for participation to complete surveys indicating clinical decision making on patients who had genetic testing. Cases for review were randomly selected to have both positive and non-positive results. Among 249 patients (138 positive, 111 non-positive), 136 (54.6%) received clinical management recommendations for their own or their at-risk relatives? care. Of these, 75 (55.1%) received recommendations for the patient?s own care, most frequently additional diagnostic tests/procedures (n=33). Compared to non-positive results, patients with positive results were more likely to receive recommendations for their own management (66/138, 47.8% vs 9/111, 8.1%; P<0.00001). Patients with positive results in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy genes had 263% higher odds of recommended management changes compared to those with TTN (OR=3.63, CI:1.40-9.84, P=0.009). The results from CM/ARRH genetic testing on affected patients influenced cardiologists? medical decision making and management recommendations. Additional research is needed to evaluate how genetic testing for CM/ARRH impact health outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variant Curation Expert Panel Recommendations for RYR1 Pathogenicity Assertions in Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility 91%
- Disease-specific variant pathogenicity prediction significantly improves variant interpretation in inherited cardiac conditions 91%
- The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Familial Hypercholesterolemia Variant Curation Expert Panel consensus guidelines for LDLR variant classification 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural History, Phenotype Spectrum and Clinical Outcomes of Desmin ( DES )-Associated Cardiomyopathy 96%
- ALPK3 heterozygous truncating variants cause late-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with frequent apical involvement and apical aneurysm 96%
- Sex-Specific Clinical and Genetic Factors Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy -- The Impact of Age at Diagnosis of the Proband on Genetic Yield, Clinical Presentation, Outcomes, and Yield of Family Screening 95%
- Pathogenic and uncertain genetic variants have clinical cardiac correlates in diverse biobank participants 94%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Competing Risks in Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverters Defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) Study 94%
- Early Experience with Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease 93%
- Global approaches to postmortem genetic testing after sudden cardiac death in the young: A survey among healthcare professionals 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.