DB-ATRG: The Density and BI-RADS-Aware Triage and Automatic Report Generation System for Mammography
Phan, V.; Tran, N. N. C.; Bui, N. T. D.; Jeter, R.
Show abstract
Background: The growing volume of mammography screenings has created severe radiologist shortages, while standard First-In, First-Out (FIFO) reading queues fail to prioritize urgent or complex cases, delaying critical diagnoses. Objective: This study introduces the Density and BI-RADS--Aware Triage and Report Generation (DB-ATRG) framework to fundamentally restructure mammography workflows by automating diagnostic text generation and enabling risk-based case prioritization. Methods: Utilizing the Digital Mammography Dataset for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Research (DMID), we fine-tuned the 4-billion parameter MedGemma 1.5 vision-language model using Quantization and Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA). The extracted biomarkers drive a dual-phase triage algorithm that flags extremely dense breasts (ACR Category D) for supplemental screening and dynamically ranks remaining cases using a calculated Cumulative Urgency Score. The clinical impact of this triage workflow was evaluated against a standard FIFO queue using a simulated cohort of 100 mammography cases. Results: DB-ATRG achieved significant improvements over the AMRG baseline in clinical text generation and classification, securing a ROUGE-L score of 0.8650, a METEOR score of 0.9001, and an ACR Density Accuracy of 0.7039. In clinical simulations, the optimized prioritization queue captured all high-risk malignancies (BI-RADS 4 and 5) within the first 20% of the reading workload, compared to just 40% in the random FIFO queue. This framework effectively accelerated the mean rank position of severe cases from 42.8 down to 3. Conclusion: By accurately automating report generation and aggressively prioritizing severe cases, the DB-ATRG framework can drastically optimize clinical resource allocation and accelerate the time-to-diagnosis for the most vulnerable patients.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing generalizability of an AI-based visual test for cervical cancer screening 94%
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Signs of Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs among US-bound Immigrants and Refugees 93%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 94%
- The clinician-AI interface: intended use and explainability in FDA-cleared AI devices for medical image interpretation 92%
- How AI is used in FDA-authorized medical devices: a taxonomy across 1,016 authorizations 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Adversarial Images to Assess the Stability of Deep Learning Models Trained on Diagnostic Images in Oncology 92%
- DeepPhe-CR: Natural Language Processing Software Services for Cancer Registrar Case Abstraction 92%
- Use of natural language understanding to facilitate surgical de-escalation of axillary staging in patients with breast cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offs 95%
- Addressing Label Noise for Electronic Health Records: Insights from Computer Vision for Tabular Data 91%
- Towards a Clinically-based Common Coordinate Framework for the Human Gut Cell Atlas - The Gut Models 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducible And Clinically Translatable Deep Neural Networks For Cervical Screening 94%
- Dual Adversarial Deconfounding Autoencoder for joint batch-effects removal from multi-center and multi-scanner radiomics data 93%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Inferred from Pathology Whole-Slide Images Links Tumor Heterogeneity to Survival in Breast and Lung Cancer 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.