DNA methylation as proxy of genetic, prenatal and perinatal psychiatric risk factors
Isaevska, E.; Mulder, R. H.; Schuurmans, I. K.; Creasey, N.; Felix, J. F.; Pingault, J.-B.; van Haren, N.; Cecil, C. A. M.; Neumann, A.
Show abstract
Background. Cord blood DNA methylation profile scores (MPSs) based on genetic and pre-/perinatal risk factors for neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs) may capture downstream biological effects and help understand how combined exposure signals contribute to NDC risk. Methods. Using data from two longitudinal birth cohorts, Generation R (N-train = 1856, N-test = 476) and ALSPAC (N-validation= 832), we developed cord blood MPSs based on genetic and pre-/perinatal NDC risk factors. We assessed individual and combined predictive performance of risk factors and MPSs for eight childhood psychiatric outcomes (four broad, four specific), measured between ages 5 and 14 years. We also evaluated if the MPSs could be combined into a composite "transmission load" MPS. Results. We validated four novel MPSs: maternal age, birthweight, and genetic liability for ADHD and schizophrenia (r range = 0.08 to 0.29) and included two previously validated MPSs: maternal smoking and gestational age (r range = 0.42 to 0.63). Jointly modeling the six MPSs with their corresponding risk factors explained on average 3.3% of variance in outcomes, higher than that explained by risk factors (1.8%) or MPSs alone (1.6%), indicating complementary sources of risk. The "transmission load" MPS did not replicate due to heterogeneous contributions of the predictors across cohorts. Conclusions. The four novel MPSs based on genetic and pre-/perinatal risk factors can serve as valuable tools for future research. Integrating genetic and prenatal risk factors with DNA methylation at birth can provide insights into their individual and joint contributions to early psychiatric risk and may improve prediction.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Are psychiatric disorders risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity? a two-sample, bidirectional, univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization study 96%
- Evaluating the role of common risk variation in the recurrence risk of schizophrenia in multiplex schizophrenia families 95%
- Genomic Influences on Self-Reported Childhood Maltreatment 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA methylation and general psychopathology in childhood: An epigenome-wide meta-analysis from the PACE consortium 97%
- Estimating the impact of transmitted and non-transmitted psychiatric and neurodevelopmental polygenic scores on youth emotional problems 95%
- Genetic neurodevelopmental clustering and dyslexia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic susceptibility to neurodevelopmental conditions associates with neonatal DNA methylation patterns in the general population: an individual participant data meta-analysis. 95%
- Investigating direct and indirect genetic effects in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using parent-offspring trios 94%
- Examining sex-differentiated genetic effects across neuropsychiatric and behavioral traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Neural Correlates and Common Biological Mechanisms of Psychopathology Spectra 95%
- The Positive End of the Polygenic Score Distribution for ADHD: A Low Risk or a Protective Factor? 94%
- Evidence of shared genetic influences underlying schizophrenia and alcohol use disorder, but not alcohol consumption 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interplay of ADHD polygenic liability with birth-related, somatic and psychosocial factors in ADHD - a nationwide study 95%
- Subcortical brain alterations in carriers of genomic copy number variants 93%
- Multivariate GWAS elucidates the genetic architecture of alcohol consumption and misuse, corrects biases, and reveals novel associations with disease 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.