Understanding attrition: Feasibility and acceptability of a behavioral intervention for dementia care partners
Lindauer, A.; Cloyes, K. G.; Dieckmann, N.; Zonker, C.; Franklin, H.; Rosenkranz, S.; Speers, A.; Kinsella, M.; Young, K.; Mooney, A.
Show abstract
INTRODUCTION: Behavioral intervention studies for family care partners for those with dementia need to be both feasible and acceptable in order implement and complete the investigative work. Our study, Tele-STELLA (Support via Technology: Living and Learning with Advancing dementia), was completed in 2025. While 188 care partners enrolled, the attrition rate was high (44%). Here we describe the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Tele-STELLA. We further describe our fidelity processes. METHODS: Quantitative measures were used to assess care partner burden, study participation, feasibility and acceptability. Our weekly survey assessed the prevalence of adverse events. Qualitative methods paralleled our quantitative findings, in that care partners generally found the study acceptable, but dementia progression and life demands made participation difficult for some. RESULTS: The total attrition rate was 44%, but was attenuated by increasing the sample size. This adequately-powered study found that the intervention significantly reduced burden. Overall, care partners found the study feasible, but care demands made participation difficult for 28 of the care partners resulting in their withdrawal. In addition, 21 care recipients died, and thus their care partners had to be removed from the study. Qualitive findings mirrored the results. DISCUSSION: Our findings reveal that, even in the later stages of dementia, care partners are willing to participate in intervention research. However, care demands and death can affect the sample size. Our data and recommendations for future studies will inform caregiving scientists in designing behavioral interventions in late-stage dementia.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 96%
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 95%
- Effectiveness of dyadic interventions in improving outcomes for adults with multiple long-term conditions and/or frailty and their informal carers: A systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 95%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 97%
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 96%
- Why is implementing remote monitoring in virtual wards (Hospital at Home) for people living with frailty so hard? Qualitative interview study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using telehealth consultations for healthcare provision to patients from racial/ethnic minorities: A systematic review 93%
- Observer: Creation of a Novel Multimodal Dataset for Outpatient Care Research 91%
- Optimizing Temporal Windows for Wearable-Augmented Post-Discharge Risk Prediction: A Methods Study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.