Assessing adverse childhood experiences and mental health status in diverse and underrepresented young people: advancing Inclusive research
Bhui, K.; Kirk, M.; Butcher, I.; Fazel, M.; Ma, M.; Cooke, P.; Farahar, C.; Foster, A.; Harris, K.; Sansoy, H.; Havers, L.; Shaughnessy, N.; Hugh-Jones, S.; Allder, L.; Mankee-Williams, A.
Show abstract
Background: Young people impacted by adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are often underrepresented in mental health research. Aims: This paper aims to advance inclusive research on ACEs by 1) describing co-designed recruitment and engagement methods in a national project on ACEs (Attune), 2) characterising a highly marginalised cohort of young people using identity descriptors co-designed with participants, and 3) reporting associations between ACEs, identity characteristics and mental health outcomes. Methods: A trauma-aware approach to engage under-represented young people was co-developed with a national youth advisory group, lived experience researchers, and trusted community partners. Our co-created purposive sampling strategy recruited 74 young people, aged 10 to 24 years, across England, seeking representation by age, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, ethnicity, neurodivergence, and geographic location. Participants completed validated self-report measures of ACEs, life events, and mental health. Descriptive, correlational and regression analyses examined cohort characteristics and associations between ACEs, identity characteristics, and mental health measures. Results: The final cohort included participants identifying as non-White British (39.5%), non-binary/other gender (25%), and neurodivergent (30%). Half of participants reported exposure to at least one ACE. Analyses identified patterns consistent with prior literature. In addition, ACEs and barriers related to being neurodivergent were associated with increased depression and anxiety symptom severity. Non-binary gender identity was associated with anxiety. We did not observe associations of ACEs or mental health measures, with sex or ethnicity. Conclusions: Under-represented groups can be reached via co-created engagement methods informed by lived experience. We identified important associations between ACEs, identities, and mental health outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 94%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents 96%
- What Treatment Outcomes Matter Most? A Q-study of Outcome Priority Profiles Among Youth with Lived Experience of Depression 96%
- Understanding priorities and needs for child and adolescent mental health in Greece from multiple informants: an open resource 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 97%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 96%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 96%
- Gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability in the time of COVID-19: a global cross-sectional study of transgender and non-binary people 95%
- Trialling an Optimised social Groups intervention in services to Enhance social connecTedness and mental Health in vulnERable young people (TOGETHER): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A thematic analysis of Prevention of Future Death Reports for Children who died by suicide in England and Wales: January 2015 to November 2023 94%
- Comparing mental health trajectories of four different types of key workers with non-key workers: A 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.