Deformable Models-Based Retinal OCT Layer Segmentation and Classification with Feature Analysis
Leyba Mesa, M. V.; Ahmad, B.; Ray, E.; Patel, A.; Barkana, B. D.
Show abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is widely used for retinal disease assessment, but automated quantitative analysis remains challenging because of anatomical variability and noisy imaging conditions. This study presents an interpretable OCT classification framework based on four anatomically guided retinal layers, combining preprocessing, adaptive segmentation, targeted feature engineering, and supervised classification to identify Normal, CNV, DME, and Drusen cases. Layer-specific descriptors included statistical, derivative, fluid-related, and GLCM texture markers. Feature correlation and ranking analyses showed that the proposed descriptors were highly complementary, that the most informative features were concentrated in layers 2 and 4, and that layers 1 and 3 contributed supportive structural information. Among the evaluated classifiers, the neural network performed best, achieving an accuracy of 98.17%, sensitivity of 97.88%, specificity of 99.38%, and AUC of 0.9985. Computational analysis showed efficient training and inference, with a total training time of 2216.3 s, prediction speed of approximately 160000 observations per second, and a compact model size of about 11 kB. These results demonstrated that anatomically guided feature extraction can provide accurate, efficient, and interpretable OCT disease classification, offering a practical alternative to less transparent end-to-end deep learning approaches.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Vis-OCT Explorer: an open-source software for visible-light optical coherence tomography data processing 96%
- A deep learning network for parallel self-denoising and segmentation in visible light optical coherence tomography of human retina 96%
- Coarse-scale Optoretinography(CoORG) with extended field-of-view for normative characterization. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques 97%
- Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks 96%
- Diagnosis of central serous chorioretinopathy by deep learning analysis of en face images of choroidal vasculature 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circular functional analysis of OCT data for precise identification of structural phenotypes in the eye 96%
- Detecting Glaucoma Worsening Using Optical Coherence Tomography Derived Visual Field Estimates 95%
- Estimating Rates of Progression and Predicting Future Visual Fields in Glaucoma Using a Deep Variational Autoencoder 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The influence of similarity, sensitivity and bias on letter identification 89%
- The effect of response biases on resolution thresholds of Sloan letters in central and paracentral vision 89%
- Explaining #TheShoe based on the optimal color hypothesis: The role of chromaticity vs. luminance distribution in ambiguous image 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning for Detection of Corneal Perforation on Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Microbial Keratitis 93%
- Detection and Measurement of Hypopyon on Slit Lamp Examination Versus Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography 92%
- Development of a 3D vascular network visualization platform for one-dimensional hemodynamic simulation 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.