A transparent multicriteria and fuzzy classification approach for genome-based probiotic candidate prioritisation
Ounissi, N. E.; Gomri, M. A.; El Hadef El Okki, M.
Show abstract
The identification of novel probiotic candidates with potential health-promoting properties remains a major challenge in food biotechnology and increasingly relies on in silico screening of genomic information. However, probiogenomic markers are heterogeneous, and safety, survival-colonisation, and functional-benefit traits do not contribute equally to probiotic potential. This study developed the Structured Probiotic Potential Index (SPPI), a fuzzy multicriteria system for genome-based probiotic candidate prioritisation. A hierarchical evaluation structure was established from probiogenomic evidence and organised into three main pillars and fourteen subcriteria. Expert judgements were collected using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, followed by consistency-based curation and weight aggregation. A curated dataset of 48 complete bacterial genomes, distributed into probiotic, potentially probiotic, neutral, and pathogenic groups, was taxonomically validated and analysed using an automated probiogenomic screening pipeline. Genome-wide screening generated 3,218 binary genomic features, from which curated probiogenomic markers were mapped to the scoring hierarchy. The resulting index was formulated as a normalised expert-weighted equation integrating safety, survival-colonisation, and functional-benefit components. SPPI prioritised genomes according to weighted probiogenomic profiles and separated pathogenic genomes from favourable probiotic and potentially probiotic profiles within the analysed dataset. Downstream Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation transformed the continuous score into probiotic/potentially probiotic, neutral, and pathogenic classes. Under internal leave-one-out evaluation, all 48 genomes were assigned to their expected reference classes, while confidence analysis distinguished high-confidence from borderline assignments. Post-classification comparison with ProbML showed concordant behaviour for most genomes and discordant predictions for selected cases. These results support SPPI as a transparent genome-based decision-support system for early probiotic candidate prioritisation before experimental validation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phylum barrier and Escherichia coli intra-species phylogeny drive the acquisition of resistome in E. coli 94%
- Use of Genome Scale Metabolic Reconstructions of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) phylogroups for the identification of lineage-specific metabolic pathways 93%
- SyFi: generating and using sequence fingerprints to distinguish SynCom isolates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut Microbiome Dynamics and Predictive Value in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Shallow and Deep Shotgun Sequencing 94%
- No Assembly Required: Using BTyper3 to Assess the Congruency of a Proposed Taxonomic Framework for the Bacillus cereus group with Historical Typing Methods 94%
- Dietary emulsifiers alter composition and activity of the human gut microbiota in vitro, irrespective of chemical or natural emulsifier origin. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The sources and transmission routes of microbial populations throughout a meat processing facility 93%
- Clinically Relevant Pathogens on Surfaces Display Differences in Survival and Transcriptomic Response in Relation to Probiotic and Traditional Cleaning Strategies 92%
- Exopolysaccharides of Lactobacillus crispatus mediate key balancing interactions with the vaginal mucosa 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.