Safe attitudes, uncertain implementation: concussion knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among parents and staff in junior community Australian football.
Bennett, H.; Fletcher, C.; Jemson-Ledger, E.; Garrett, J.
Show abstract
Introduction: Parents and club staff are primarily responsible for recognising and managing concussion in junior community Australian Football (ARF), yet no recent research has examined their knowledge or practices. This study assessed concussion knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among parents and staff in junior (under-16 years) community ARF, and identified management practices and perceived barriers. Methods: An online survey assessing concussion knowledge and attitudes (RoCKAS-ST), confidence, and AFL-specific guideline knowledge was distributed nationally to parents and staff of junior community ARF players. A subsample whose child had a concussion in the previous 12 months completed additional questions on management practices. Closed-ended responses were analysed descriptively and using Pearsons correlation. Open-ended responses underwent qualitative content analysis. Results: Responses (n=223) reflected high general concussion knowledge (76.6% of maximum) and positive attitudes toward safe concussion management (86.8% of maximum), but AFL-specific guideline knowledge was limited (49.8%). Self-reported confidence was not associated with knowledge (r = -0.04) or attitudes (r = .09). Among 58 respondents whose child recently sustained a concussion, medical evaluation (74.1%) and clearance prior to return (60.3%) were common, but graded return-to-play protocol use (50.0%) and club support during recovery (43.1%) were inconsistent. Knowledge gaps (70.4%), cultural attitudes favouring playing through symptoms (29.6%), and inadequate volunteer capacity (29.6%) were most common barriers. Conclusions: Parents and staff in junior community ARF hold safe attitudes toward concussion but lack the sport-specific knowledge, structural support, and resources to translate these attitudes into practice. Targeted, mandated education, and improved support are needed to close this gap.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: an interview study 95%
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 95%
- Organized community sport participation in children and youth with physical disability: a scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 92%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 91%
- Quantifying paddling kinematic through muscle activation and whole body coordination during maximal sprint of different duration on a kayak ergometer: a pilot study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can prognostic factors for indirect muscle injuries in elite football (soccer) players be identified using data from preseason screening? An exploratory analysis using routinely-collected periodic health examination records 94%
- Athletes’ access to, attitudes towards, and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: A scoping review protocol 93%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning-Based Pattern Recognition of Risk Factors for Low Back Pain among Adolescent Cricket Players in Dhaka City 94%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 89%
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.