Back

Quantifying the global burden of lead exposure from dietary lead intake

Kinally, C.; Hu, H.; Fuller, R.

2026-07-21 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.07.20.26358457 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Lead exposure is estimated to cause approximately 3.5 million premature deaths a year, yet the key ongoing sources of lead exposure are unclear. Methods: We estimated the contribution of dietary lead intake to global blood lead levels (BLLs) for 7-year-old children and 22-year-old adults by applying the All-Ages Lead Model (AALM) to calculate blood lead levels (BLLs) based on 25 total diet studies (TDS) that quantify dietary lead intake across 46 countries. Results: For children, the population-weighted average dietary lead intake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (32.0 g/day) was found to be more than three times higher than in high-income countries (HICs) (9.3 g/day), and more than 10 times higher than the FDA reference level for children (2.2 g/day). The average impact on BLLs for children is estimated to be near 29 g/L in LMICs and near 12 g/L in HICs. Averaged across the TDS data, vegetables (27%) and cereals (24%) were found to contribute the most to dietary lead. Conclusions: While there are limitations associated with biokinetic modelling and the TDS data from LMICs, these results suggest that the contribution of dietary lead intake to global lead exposure is in the region of 40 to 50%, suggesting, in turn, that dietary lead intake is likely a major global driver of lead poisoning. Lead absorbed from the environment into food crops is expected to be the key driver of dietary lead. Current regulatory levels for maximum lead concentrations in foods (0.05-0.3 mg/kg) are out-of-date and may imply a dietary lead intake of 200 g/day, far higher than the FDA reference level (2.2 g/day). Collecting representative TDS data in high lead burden countries should be a priority. Further research is also recommended on upstream lead sources and pathways of lead uptake in plants, driving global food contamination.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.1%
2
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Chemosphere
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
7
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
The Innovation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
14
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
17
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
18
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
19
Archives of Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
20
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%