Back

Effects of AI-driven Lifestyle Intervention on Psychological Well-Being and Body Image Among Young Adults In Malaysia

Najwa, A.; Azmi, I.; Zafran, A.; Adibah, N.; Zulkafli, H.; Iman, A.; Linoby, A.

2026-07-21 nutrition
10.64898/2026.07.20.26358442 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: University students experience substantial psychological well-being and body-image concerns, while scalable, personalized digital support remains underexamined in Malaysia. Artificial intelligence chatbots may deliver repeated lifestyle guidance, but the incremental value of personalization over structured chatbot support is uncertain. Objectives: This study evaluated changes in psychological well-being and body appreciation following a 12 week personalized AI-powered lifestyle intervention, NExGEN, among Malaysian university students. Methods: A two-arm, controlled, quasi-experimental pre-post study allocated 140 students aged 18 to 35 years by matched blocks to NExGEN (n = 70) or a structured-prompt ChatGPT control (n = 70). NExGEN generated adaptive weekly lifestyle actions from a 47-item onboarding assessment, whereas control participants received standardized weekly prompts covering the same lifestyle domains. Psychological well-being and body appreciation were assessed at baseline and week 12 using the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index and Body Appreciation Scale-2. Intention-to-treat linear mixed models estimated adjusted within-group changes and between-group differences in change, with Holm adjustment for the co-primary outcomes. Results: Week-12 assessments were completed by 121 participants (86.43%). In NExGEN, psychological well-being improved by an adjusted 8.68 points (95% CI, 6.22 to 11.14), z = 6.91, p < .001, and body appreciation improved by 0.17 points (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.24), z = 4.82, p < .001. However, between-group differences in change were not statistically significant for psychological well-being (2.87 points; 95% CI, -0.48 to 6.23; z = 1.68; Holm-adjusted p = .093) or body appreciation (0.10 points; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.19; z = 1.99; Holm-adjusted p = .093). Median platform logins were 68.00 in NExGEN and 58.50 in control; mean acceptability scores were 3.92 and 3.59, respectively. Conclusions: NExGEN participation was associated with significant within-group improvements in psychological well-being and body appreciation, but personalized guidance did not demonstrate superiority over structured chatbot guidance. Because allocation was quasi-experimental, causal attribution remains limited. Randomized component-level trials are needed to determine whether personalization provides incremental benefit.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.5%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
3
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
5
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
6
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
14
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
23
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
29
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%