Living with Long Covid: A Qualitative Analysis of Experiences, Coping Strategies and Care across the Illness Journey in Switzerland
Boehm, R.; Frei, A.; Haag, C.; von Wyl, V.; Hoch, T.; Menges, D.; Radtke, T.; Puhan, M. A.; Gille, F.; Ballouz, T.
Show abstract
Background: Long Covid affects millions worldwide and disrupts the personal, professional, and social lives of those affected. Yet, insights on the day-to-day experience of living with Long Covid, how people adapt to the condition, and how they experience care remain limited. Methods: Between November 2024 and February 2025, we recruited people living with Long Covid through Long Covid related studies and patient networks. Data were collected through a one-time semi-structured survey, completed using a speech-to-text feature with automatic transcription, and addressing 1) key events and experiences, 2) coping and support strategies, and 3) advice to others affected. We applied an inductive thematic analysis to develop a framework of key themes. Results: We included 137 participants (median age 48 years, 73.7% women, median three years since SARS-CoV-2 infection). Analysis yielded 13 sub-themes within four key themes: medical issues; social, occupational and health care impact; barriers to recovery; and resources and strategies. Participants described a broad range of symptoms, most notably fatigue, cognitive difficulties, post-exertional crashes and psychological symptoms including depression and, in some cases, suicidal thoughts. These symptoms profoundly disrupted their social, working and family lives. In severe cases, independent living became impossible, with social isolation, severely reduced activity, and financial difficulties. Many described a long diagnostic journey in which symptoms were frequently dismissed as psychological and early advice to stay active that worsened their condition. The health care and social security systems were seen as ill-equipped to support people affected by Long Covid. With no effective causal therapies, treatment focused on symptom relief and participants tried many complementary and alternative treatments. Pacing was the only strategy widely used and perceived as effective in preventing crashes, alongside lifestyle adjustment, peer support, and maintaining hope. Conclusion: These narrative accounts reveal a multidimensional burden of Long Covid, one that is exacerbated by how affected people are treated within the health and social systems. These findings underscore the need for empathic, knowledgeable care, validation of people's experiences, and policy frameworks equipped to recognize and support people with Long Covid. Patient or Public Contribution: This study is about the lived experiences of people affected by Long Covid. During the conceptualization phase, we consulted three people with lived experience of Long Covid to discuss the relevance of the research questions and study design. All participants received a newsletter with a plain language summary of interim findings. Following completion of this analysis, we conducted a focus group discussion with eight participants to validate our findings, identify gaps, and ensure that the findings accurately reflected their experiences. Feedback from this process informed the final manuscript.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 97%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 96%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 98%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 95%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 96%
- The impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lived experiences of people living in Thailand, Malaysia, Italy and the United Kingdom: a cross-country qualitative study 94%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index: an e-PROM designed for Telehealth 95%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 94%
- Individual factors influencing public’s perceptions about the importance of COVID-19 immunity certificates: a cross-sectional online questionnaire survey in the UK 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is my cough a cold or covid? A qualitative study of COVID-19 symptom recognition and attitudes towards testing in the UK 94%
- Transnational adoptees in healthcare: barriers, resources, and needs 93%
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.