Back

Cyclic immunofluorescence platform using photocleavable linkers for direct antibody labeling enables cancer phenotyping

Zucker, A.; Nguyen, C.; Brondsted, F.; Jones, J. A.; Malankar, G. S.; Ekstrom, T. J.; Rounds, C.; Ravi, D.; Goodyear, S. M.; Kardosh, A.; Wong, M. H.; Wang, L. G.; Gibbs, S. L.

2026-07-20 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.07.19.735577 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Advances in spatial proteomics through the development of multiplexed immunostaining platforms have facilitated analyses with increasing cellular and molecular granularity. However, currently available approaches are limited by harsh conditions for signal removal, restricting the number of antigens that can be probed in a single specimen without significant alterations to sample quality and structure. Here we present an approach for direct labeling of primary antibodies with fluorophores using a photocleavable linker (PCL) with a polyethylene glycol spacer (PEG) to enable cyclic immunofluorescence (cyCIF) with gentle signal removal conditions. Our innovative approach uses directly labeled primary antibodies to enhance staining specificity and cyclic immunostaining efficiency, while minimizing nonspecific background signal. Additionally, through integration of the PCL, this approach facilitates gentle cleavage of antibody conjugated fluorophore, preserving sample integrity over multiple rounds of staining. Direct PEG-PCL antibody labeling will promote greater multiplexing by minimizing specimen damage and allow for quantitative analyses of cyCIF spatial data. We demonstrate that cyCIF with PEG-PCL conjugated antibodies can be applied across a variety of cancer subtypes to identify and characterize rare neoplastic cell populations in both tumor tissue and fragile peripheral blood specimens.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.