Back

Developing a Heart Failure Readmission Model From Inpatient Electronic Medical Record Data

Martin, E. A.; Lee, S.; Walker, R.; Pitka, E.; Soroush, M. Z.; Ezekowitz, J.; Howlett, J. G.; Fine, N. M.; Bakal, J. A.; Quan, H.; Eastwood, C. A.

2026-07-21 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.18.26358391 medRxiv
Show abstract

Importance: Heart failure readmissions remain common following hospitalization, but accurately identifying which patients will be readmitted after discharge remains challenging. Improved prediction could support targeted transitional care interventions and more efficient allocation of clinical resources. Objective: In this study we attempted to improve readmission prediction after heart failure hospitalization by using variables chosen through a modified Delphi process, and using inpatient Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data, focusing on clinical notes. Design: This prognostic study developed competing risk survival models to predict readmission after heart failure hospitalization. Variables were chosen using a modified Delphi process, and extracted from EMR notes using various natural language processing techniques or from other EMR elements where appropriate. Patients were admitted between 2011 through 2019, and at least one year of follow-up was available for all patients. Models were evaluated using C-statistics, as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. Setting: During the study period, all acute-care facilities in Calgary, Alberta used the same EMR system, from which patients were selected. Participants: Patients were 18 years or older, resided in Alberta, and were admitted to a Calgary hospital. All corresponding admissions with a most responsible diagnosis of heart failure were included (n=15,160). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome of interest was readmission within 30 days, though 90- and 365-day time frames were also analyzed. Death was treated as a competing risk and analysed at those time frames as well.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
15.2%
2
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Epidemiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%