Identifying and Characterising Common Genetic Differences in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder
Willcocks, I. R.; Richards, A.; Legge, S. E.; Holmans, P.; Di Florio, A.; Cardno, A. G.; O'donovan, M. C.; Owen, M. J.; Pardinas, A. F.; Walters, J. T.
Show abstract
Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are diagnostically distinct categories that overlap substantially in clinical features and genetic aetiology. Understanding genetic variants that contribute liability specifically to each disorder can offer insights into biological processes that differentiate them. Here we used Case-Case GWAS (CC-GWAS) to identify common genetic variants differentially associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, analysing 67,390 schizophrenia cases and 41,917 bipolar disorder cases. We identified 19 genome-wide significant loci, of which 16 (84%) demonstrated divergent genetic effects with risk alleles showing opposite directions of association between disorders. The CC-GWAS summary statistics had detectable disorder-differentiating heritability (10.27%, SE=0.01) and showed genetic correlations indicating that SCZ-differentiating alleles were associated with lower educational attainment, lower cognitive performance, and increased risk of ADHD, anorexia, autism, BD1 (though not BD2), cannabis use disorder, and OCD. Four loci showed divergent effects despite not reaching genome-wide significance in either individual disorder GWAS, demonstrating enhanced power to detect opposite-direction effects. Functional annotation identified 102 mapped genes significantly enriched for expression across all 13 tested brain regions, with no significant enrichment in peripheral tissues, and gene set enrichment analysis implicated neuronal projection and synaptic compartments as the strongest biological themes differentiating the two disorders. Polygenic risk scores derived from these disorder-differentiating variants were associated with earlier age at onset and more severe negative symptoms in schizophrenia, consistent with these variants marking neurodevelopmental dimensions of illness. Our findings provide targets for understanding pathogenic differences between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and demonstrate that genuine divergent genetic effects exist beyond the substantial shared liability.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the role of common risk variation in the recurrence risk of schizophrenia in multiplex schizophrenia families 97%
- Are psychiatric disorders risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity? a two-sample, bidirectional, univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization study 96%
- Pairwise genetic meta-analyses between schizophrenia and substance dependence phenotypes reveals novel association signals 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased Prevalence of Rare Copy Number Variants in Treatment-Resistant Psychosis 96%
- Spatial expression pattern of ZNF391 gene in the brains of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorders or major depressive disorder identifies new cross-disorder biotypes: A trans-diagnostic, top-down approach 94%
- Epigenetic Element-Based Transcriptome-Wide Association Study Identifies Novel Genes for Bipolar Disorder 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Analysis of Psychosis Biotypes: Shared Ancestry-Adjusted Polygenic Risk and Unique Genomic Associations 96%
- Immunological Drivers and Potential Novel Drug Targets for Major Psychiatric, Neurodevelopmental, and Neurodegenerative Conditions 95%
- Genetic neurodevelopmental clustering and dyslexia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-Dependent Shared and Non-Shared Genetic Architecture Across Mood and Psychotic Disorders 95%
- The genetics of the mood disorder spectrum: genome-wide association analyses of over 185,000 cases and 439,000 controls 95%
- Genetic risk underlying psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in Huntington’s Disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.