Physical activity and life expectancy in Queensland, Australia: a lifetable analysis

To estimate the life expectancy gains that could be realised from increases in Queenslanders physical activity (PA) levels. Design Lifetable analysis Setting, Participants We modelled the 2025 Queensland population aged [≥]40 years. Modelled scenarios We applied two approaches. In the first, we estimated life expectancy differences between device-measured PA quartiles, with quartile1 representing the least active and quartile 4 the most active. In the second, we compared observed device-measured PA levels in Queensland with scenarios in which all individuals moved to either [≥]12,000 steps/day or [≤]2,000 steps/day. We converted the steps per day by age group and PA quartile into equivalent daily minutes of moderate-intensity walking at 4.8 km/h. Additional scenarios were explored in sensitivity analyses. Main outcomes Changes in life expectancy, and total life-years gained over the lifetime of the modelled population. Benefits were also translated into minutes of life gained per additional hour walked. Results If all Queenslanders aged [≥]40 years were as active as the most active quartile, life expectancy at birth could be 88.3 years, an increase of 4.8 years above the life expectancy at observed activity levels. The life expectancy differences between individuals in the least active quartile and the most active quartile was 9.7 years. Achieving the activity level of the most active quartile would require individuals in the lowest activity quartile to undertake an additional 85.9 minutes/day of moderate-intensity walking, with each extra hour of PA associated with an average gain of approximately 3 hours (177 minutes) of life. In step-based modelling, life expectancy in the most active scenario (all achieving [≥]12,000 steps/day) was higher by {approx}7.1 years compared with the least active scenario (all at [≤]2,000 steps/day). Conclusions Increasing PA could yield meaningful gains in life expectancy for Queenslanders, with the largest gains seen in least active individuals. Our findings strengthen the case for prioritising investment in PA -promoting programs and environments.