Distributed resonant coupling enables high efficiency power transfer to mm-scale bioelectronics
Rho, S.; Knuf, G.; Naik, A.; Roh, K.; Wang, K.; Cherukuri, S. L.; Pai, A.; Taheri, S.; Sideris, C.; Krishnan, S.
Show abstract
Miniaturized implantable bioelectronics offer breakthrough potential in disease treatment, biomarker monitoring, and physiological sensing. However, wireless power transfer (WPT) remains a central limitation for millimeter-scale devices, as scaling down the receiver size rapidly decreases coupling efficiency due to tissue attenuation, low quality-factors, reduced mutual inductance, and limited tolerance to spatial and angular displacement. Here, we introduce distributed resonant coupling (DRC), a 3-coil WPT paradigm which enables the receiver (Rx) to actively participate in a strongly coupled resonance, transforming the Rx from a passive energy harvester into an active participant in a strongly coupled regime. By co-designing transmitters (Tx), resonators (Rs), and mm-scale receiver coils (Rx) as fully coupled systems, DRC exhibits simulated maximum power levels of 66%, measured received power transfer efficiencies of [~]56%, and end-to-end DC power transfer efficiencies of 42%, delivering >420 mW to loads at 1 W of transmitted power while maintaining robust performance across a range of practically relevant orientations and tissue media. Systematic theoretical and experimental efforts establish core design rules for DRC systems enabling operation without specialized tuning integrated circuits or components. To illustrate the capabilities of DRC in practical applications in vivo, we demonstrate three technologies that capture a broad application space in bioelectronics: implant localization, rapid wireless battery charging, and ultraminiaturized drug delivery devices compatible with particulate drug formulations. Taken together, these results suggest operational capabilities across a wide range of angular tolerances (up to 60{degrees}), tissue depths and dielectric and scattering media.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Wireless Network of Implantable Microstimulators for Addressable and Patterned Electrical Brain Stimulation 96%
- Electro-optical mechanically flexible coaxial microprobes for minimally invasive interfacing with intrinsic neural circuits 94%
- Spatially expandable fiber-based probes as a multifunctional deep brain interface 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal layer-crossing interrogation of brain circuits enabled by microfluidic axialtrodes 93%
- Synergizing algorithmic design, photoclick chemistry and multi-material volumetric printing for accelerating complex shape engineering 91%
- Stiffness-tunable neurotentacles for minimally invasive implantation and long-term neural activity recordings 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.