Back

Hypertension Phenotypes in a National Database: A Three-Axis State Model Integrating Diagnosis, Treatment Intensity, and Blood Pressure Control (The NDB-K7Ps-Study-8)

nakajima, K.; Sekine, A.

2026-07-19 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.16.26358276 medRxiv
Show abstract

Hypertension is commonly defined as a binary condition despite substantial heterogeneity in diagnosis, treatment, and blood pressure (BP) control. We propose a three-axis state model integrating diagnosis status, treatment intensity, and BP control to better characterize hypertension phenotypes. The framework generates 27 possible states that can be condensed into seven clinically meaningful groups. We applied the model to 5,129,584 Japanese adults using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups. Hierarchical cluster analysis, sensitivity analysis excluding patients with cardiovascular diseases other than hypertension, and validation against antihypertensive medication use were performed. Overall, 64% of participants were classified as normotensive, whereas 36% belonged to hypertension-related groups, including 11% with unrecognized hypertension and 7% with diagnosed but untreated hypertension. Agreement with data-driven hierarchical cluster analysis was substantial (weighted {kappa}=0.87). The group distribution remained largely unchanged in the sensitivity analysis, supporting the robustness of the proposed classification. Hypertension diagnosis also showed high validity, with a sensitivity of 96.5%, specificity of 91.8%, and substantial agreement with antihypertensive medication use ({kappa}=0.78). This three-axis framework provides a robust and clinically interpretable approach for characterizing hypertension phenotypes, enabling systematic identification of care gaps and supporting research, clinical decision-making, and population health management.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
4
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.4%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
10
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Hypertension
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
17
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
19
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
22
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Science Bulletin
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%