Back

Assessing electronic health record potential for adaptive learning in multimorbidity care in Sub-Saharan Africa: a mixed-methods study of Zimbabwe's Impilo system

Dhodho, E.; Choga, K.; Mundoga, F.; Chimberengwa, P. T.; Gongora, R. T.; Webb, K.; Chinyanga, T. T.; Banda, F.; Masiye, K.; Midzi, N.; Mudavanhu, J.; Katsidzira, A.; Manyiyo, B.; Apollo, T.; Chimbetete, C.; Mhlanga, T.; Mangisi, P.; Gwanzura, C.; Tsvangirayi, S.; Dixon, J.; Nitsch, D.

2026-07-19 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.16.26357920 medRxiv
Show abstract

Electronic health records (EHR) are increasingly recognised as critical digital infrastructure for integrated, patient-centred care in the context of rising multimorbidity. In low-resource settings, national EHRs may also support locally driven learning to improve adaptive care across chronic conditions. However, there is limited empirical evidence on whether and how these systems enable learning within routine care in ways that inform broader system adaptation. We conducted a qualitative multi-method assessment of Impilo, Zimbabwe's national EHR, to examine its capacity to support learning for integrated multimorbidity care at primary care level, using HIV-hypertension as a tracer condition pair. Guided by Friedman's socio-technical infrastructure model as the analytical framework and Learning Health Systems (LHS) theory as the interpretive framework, data were drawn from documentary review, ethnographic observation, patient journey mapping, and interviews with frontline health workers and key stakeholders. Frontline learning for person-centred multimorbidity care was actively generated through interpretation of patient trajectories, experiential adjustment, and coordination across HIV and hypertension services using both the EHR and paper-based artefacts such as registers and patient booklets. However, this learning remained largely encounter-bound and weakly stabilised. Impilo did not routinely provide usable longitudinal patient views, practice-facing analytic tools, or institutionalised mechanisms for collective reflection required to support integrated multimorbidity care. Consequently, learning was largely confined to incremental adjustment within existing workflows, with limited capacity to inform broader changes to care pathways, routines, or system design. These findings suggest that the principal barrier to developing LHS is not the absence of data or frontline learning capacity, but the lack of socio-technical arrangements that enable learning to stabilise and inform system adaptation. Digitalisation alone is insufficient to support adaptive multimorbidity care. Co-production with frontline health workers may provide a pathway for aligning digital system design with routine care realities.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
3
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
6
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
11
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
13
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
14
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%