Habitat Type and Seasonal Variation as Drivers of Mosquito Proliferation in Urban Aquatic Microhabitats
Carruth, S. G.; Michael, J. C.; Vasquez, C.; Mutebi, J.-P.; Litvinova, M.; Wilke, A. B. B.
Show abstract
Aedes aegypti is the primary vector species for dengue, Zika, and chikungunya viruses, and is adapted to thrive in urban environments. Their proximity to human populations and the adverse health outcomes associated with arboviral infections make mosquito control essential for reducing the risk of outbreaks and disease spread. Source reduction and larvicide applications are central components of mosquito control because they reduce adult mosquito emergence by targeting immature life stages. Therefore, our objective was to identify urban aquatic habitats used by Ae. aegypti and assess temporal variation in their contribution to immature mosquito production. To distinguish habitat use from habitat productivity, we considered larval presence as an indicator of oviposition or early-stage survival and pupal presence as evidence that a habitat supported development through most of the immature life cycle. Between July 2018 and October 2019, 2,482 inspections in Miami-Dade County, Florida, identified 2,756 aquatic habitats from which 19,466 Ae. aegypti larvae and 3,648 pupae were collected. Unique temporal trends were observed for both larval and pupal presence and abundance at county and habitat resolutions. County-level trends showed the highest larval and pupal production during Summer and the lowest pupal production during Winter. However, temporal patterns differed across habitats, supporting a context-dependent interpretation of habitat conduciveness, in which the same habitat type may support different levels of immature mosquito production depending on local environmental conditions. Our results show that habitats with frequent larval occurrence did not consistently have high pupal presence, indicating that larval presence does not necessarily reflect habitat productivity. Control strategies that prioritize habitats repeatedly associated with pupal production by season may improve year-round mosquito control, outbreak preparedness, and resource allocation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of human-mosquito contact rate using surveys and its application in determining dengue viral transmission risk 94%
- Urban ecology of arboviral mosquito vectors along the Kenyan coast 93%
- From forests to fields: investigating Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance and diversity in cattle pastures and adjacent woodlands 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mosquito seasonality and trap type evaluation using routine surveillance data from New Orleans, Louisiana, United States 96%
- Frequent sugar feeding behavior by Aedes aegypti in Bamako, Mali makes them ideal candidates for control with attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) 95%
- Patterns of Aedes aegypti immature ecology and arboviral epidemic risks in peri-urban and intra-urban villages of Cocody-Bingerville, Cote d'Ivoire: insights from a dengue outbreak 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Household-Level Risk Factors for Aedes aegypti Pupal Density in Guayaquil, Ecuador 96%
- The Mosquito Electrocuting Trap As An Exposure-Free Method For Measuring Human Biting Rates By Aedes Mosquito Vectors 95%
- An assessment of adult mosquito collection techniques for studying species abundance and diversity in Maferinyah, Guinea 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Do tigers hunt during the day? Diel Activity of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), in Urban and Suburban Habitats of North America 96%
- Bionomics of Aedes aegypti during the 2016-2017 dengue outbreaks in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso 95%
- Diel activity patterns of vector mosquito species in the urban environment: Implications for vector control strategies 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.