Back

Trance practice and well-being measures: the case of Auto-Induced Cognitive Trance

Fernandez, A.; Foncelle, A.; Meunier, H.; Van-Der-Henst, J.-B.; Revillet, F.; Breton, A.

2026-07-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.07.15.26358125 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Auto-Induced Cognitive Trance (AICT) is a non-ordinary state of consciousness (NOSC) that can be accessed by will alone once a standardised self-induction procedure has been learnt. The first research publication on AICT dates back only ten years, meaning that research on this phenomenon is still in its infancy. Previous reports concerning the phenomenology and neurophysiology of AICT revealed similarities with more extensively described NOSCs, as well as unusual features, raising questions about the potential benefits of AICT practice for well-being. Objective This study aimed to gather quantitative descriptive data on features associated with well-being in a large comparative sample of AICT practitioners and non-practitioners. Method This research followed a web-based survey study design which enquired AICT-trained and yet-to-be trained participants to self-report through validated standardised questionnaires on vitality, self-esteem, mental well-being, trait anxiety, life satisfaction, happiness, positive and negative affect, nature-relatedness and connectedness. Data on NOSCs practices, life history events that could have led to spontaneous NOSCs, and demographic data were collected for further inclusion as control variables in statistical models. Results The online questionnaire yielded 607 valid responses, (171 yet-to-be trained participants and 436 AICT-trained participants). AICT practice was found to be associated with increased self-esteem (RSE), overall connectedness (WCS) as well as all subdimensions of connectedness (WCS Self, WCS Others, WCS World). AICT practice Duration exhibited significant effects on global connectedness and all subdimensions of connectedness, self-esteem, trait anxiety (STAIT-5), and positive affect (PANAS+). Conclusions AICT seems to benefit to practitioners well-being shortly after training through increases in self-esteem and in the sense of connectedness. Prolonged AICT practice is associated with added decreased trait anxiety and increased positive affect. Further research is needed to confirm these findings with a sample including AICT-uninterested participants, and to clarify the underlying mechanisms of AICT.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
27.6%
2
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
3
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
5
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.4%
7
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
14
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Physiology & Behavior
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%