Back

Development of a Matrix-Matched Calibration Curve for Multi-Site Quantification of Neu5Gc-Bearing N-Glycans

DeBono, N. J.; Moh, E. S.; Poole, J.; Packer, N. H.; Day, C. J.; Jennings, M. P.; Kolarich, D.; Ashwood, C.

2026-07-15 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.07.14.738351 bioRxiv
Show abstract

N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) has been repeatedly associated with human cancer, but reliable detection has remained elusive, generating controversy regarding its presence in human samples. To address this, matrix-matched calibration curves, which have been pioneered in proteomics and metabolomics for assessing changes in complex mixtures, were measured of released N-glycans at four orders of magnitude dynamic range in defined mixtures, systematically benchmarking Neu5Gc-containing N-glycan detection across multiple LC-MS platforms and sites. Orthogonally, the gold-standard analytical method, consisting of fluorescence detection of labelled monosaccharides separated by LC, was applied to the same samples, yielding absolute concentrations of Neu5Gc. LC-MS demonstrated an extended detection range of three or more orders of magnitude while retaining intact N-glycan measurement, improving assay specificity and enabling detection of the variety of Neu5Gc-bearing N-glycans. By combining orthogonal dimensions of evidence, including chromatographic separation, isotopic distribution matching, and composition-confirming MS/MS, LC-MS confidently resolved Neu5Gc signals from noise, even at low abundance. In comparison, DMB-LC-FLR was limited to two orders of magnitude dynamic range, insufficient for detection of Neu5Gc in commercially available pooled human sera. These findings strongly support that DMB-LC-FLR assay specificity and sensitivity are insufficient for Neu5Gc detection in human samples due to noise overwhelming the Neu5Gc signal. By establishing a reusable benchmarking framework for future glycomic studies, we aim to use LC-MS to improve the measurement of Neu5Gc in clinical samples.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.3%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
8
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.7%
10
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
Clinical Proteomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Journal of Proteomics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
19
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
20
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
21
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%