Back

MInt-HDX: Leveraging Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry and Machine-Learning to Improve Protein-Ligand Docking.

Lowe, V.; Smith, A. K.; Parakra, R.; Toci, E.; Freel Meyers, C. L.; Deredge, D.

2026-07-16 biophysics
10.64898/2026.07.14.738285 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding protein structural dynamics is central to elucidating biological function and guiding therapeutic discovery. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) typically offers peptide-level, and sometimes residue-level, time-dependent insights into protein structure, conformational dynamics and/or ligand binding. Yet, translating HDX-MS data into atomic-resolution insights and deriving mechanistic understanding remains a key challenge. Integrative strategies which utilize HDX-MS to inform computational modeling or simulations, traditionally leverage HDX-MS data with physics-based approaches through the calculation of protection factors models. Here, we developed MInt-HDX, a hybrid physics-based, machine- learning framework trained on differential HDX-MS signatures across 11 protein-ligand systems or 1032 individual peptides, using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to guide small-molecule ligand docking and pose selection. By leveraging XGBoost-predicted interacting residues with three-dimensional clustering and convex-hull geometric algorithms, MInt-HDX first generates HDX-guided candidate docking sites in 3D for physics-based molecular docking and then, following docking, employs HDX-MS-informed XGBoost filtering and scoring functions for ligand- pose ranking. MInt-HDX was validated across 3 protein-ligand systems, consistently resulting in Ligand-RMSD within 3 [A] of the crystallographic ligand conformation, individual steps of MInt- HDX were optimized and its overall performance was assessed against HDX-MS data quality factors and benchmarked against common physics-based and machine learning based docking approaches. Together, this work highlights how machine learning, informed by HDX-MS and aided by physics-based approaches, can bridge the gap between solution-phase HDX-MS data and structural modeling to accelerate protein-ligand discovery pipelines. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=78 SRC="FIGDIR/small/738285v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f7d1dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14f074aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@167a9b1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b5c502_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.