Back

Evaluation of polygenic risk scores and ambient air pollutants for lung cancer risk stratification in a lung cancer screening cohort

Trap, L.; Buyukcelik, R.; Antonissen, N.; Sidorenkov, G. A.; Ruiter, R.; Van Heemst, J.; Sedaghati-Khayat, B.; Stikker, B. S.; Dumoulin, D. W.; Gietema, H. A.; Heuvelmans, M. A.; Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A.; De Jong, P. A.; Uitterlinden, A. G.; Brusselle, G.; Jacobs, C.; Aerts, J. G. J. V.; Vermeulen, R. C. H.; De Bock, G. H.; Groen, H. J. M.; Vliegenthart, R.; Downward, G. S.; Stadhouders, R.; Van Rooij, J.; NELSON-POP consortium,

2026-07-16 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.07.14.26358054 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Randomized controlled trials have shown that computed tomographic (CT) screening reduces lung cancer mortality. Improved identification of at-risk groups, by leveraging non-smoking risk factors, could help refine screening selection. Aim: To evaluate polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and ambient air pollution (AAP) exposure for risk stratification in the NELSON lung cancer screening cohort. Methods: Two PRSs (PRS-McKay/PRS-Byun) and several AAPs (including nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter [PM]) were assessed in the NELSON lung cancer screening trial (N=7,364). PRSs were validated in the Rotterdam Study (N=11,493). Associations with lung cancer, mortality, screening results, and discriminative ability to distinguish lung cancer were evaluated. Results: PRS-McKay and PRS-Byun were associated with lung cancer (odds ratio [OR] per SD [95%CI]: 1.22 [1.08-1.37] and 1.28 [1.13-1.44], respectively) and lung cancer-specific mortality (OR [95%CI]: 1.24 [1.05-1.47], for both), but not with non-lung cancer mortality (OR [95%CI]: 1.01 [0.94-1.10] and 1.03 [0.95-1.12], respectively). Exposure to PM2.5 was associated with lung cancer (OR [95%CI]: 1.11 [1.01-1.22]). PM constituents were associated with adenocarcinoma, particularly PM10 (OR [95%CI]: 1.16 [1.01-1.32]) and ultra-fine particles (OR [95%CI]: 1.16 [1.04-1.30]). PRS and AAP added modestly to the discriminative ability for lung cancer on top of pack-years, age, and sex (area under the curve [95%CI]: 0.659 [0.624-0.695] vs. 0.643 [0.608-0.679]). Conclusions: PRSs and exposure to PM were associated with lung cancer in a high-risk screening population. The primary potential of PRSs may reside in refining lung cancer screening selection toward individuals at higher risk of dying from lung cancer specifically.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.6%
7
Respiratory Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
11
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
13
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
The Innovation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
18
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.0%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
26
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%