Back

Are CNV Risk Scores Linked to Neurodevelopmental and Mental Health Characteristics Within CNV-Associated Intellectual Disability?

Chi, Z.; Alexander-Bloch, A.; Neufeld, S. A.; Wolstencroft, J.; Skuse, D.; IMAGINE-ID consortium, ; Baker, K.

2026-07-16 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.07.14.26358034 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Children and young people (CYP) with intellectual disability (ID) frequently have co-occurring neurodevelopmental (ND) and mental health (MH) difficulties. While copy number variants (CNVs) are identified as an important aetiology of ID, it is unclear whether and how CNV risk scores predict ND and MH characteristics within the CNV-associated ID population. Methods: We analysed data from the UK-based IMAGINE-ID cohort of CYP (aged 4-19 years) with ID and clinically-reported CNVs (N = 1,640). CNVs were annotated with Gencode 19 in ENSEMBL to calculate CNV risk scores, including summed probability of loss-of-function intolerance (pLI) and dosage sensitivity. Multivariate regression models examined the prediction of CNV variables and inheritance on ND and MH characteristics, assessed via the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA). Post-hoc analyses explored CNV variable stratification (lower vs. higher range pLI). Results: Higher summed pLI scores (indexing CNV genes' intolerance to loss of function) unexpectedly predicted fewer MH difficulties and a lower likelihood of ND diagnoses, even after accounting for demographic factors and CNV inheritance. Post-hoc analyses identified a threshold effect. Within the lower pLI range, higher pLI scores were associated with greater MH difficulties, consistent with findings from population-based samples. In contrast, within the higher pLI range, higher pLI scores were associated with fewer MH difficulties (among individuals more likely to have severe ID). Conclusion: These findings challenge the assumption that CNV genomic "risk scores" universally predict ND and MH difficulties. Instead, within CNV-associated ID, complex relationships exist between CNV risk scores, inheritance and phenotypes. These insights emphasise the necessity of integrating genomic results with familial and developmental context to understand individual vulnerabilities and support needs.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
JCPP Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
7
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
26
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
29
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%