Back

The Swiss Integrated Care (INCA) Study: Description of a Novel Prospective Cohort of Patients and Caregivers in Reimbursed Informal Care

Nittas, V.; Heiniger, S.; Haag, C.; Frei, A.; von Wyl, V.; Aebersold, H.; Eid Madkour, M.; Hellmann, A.; Puhan, M. A.

2026-07-15 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.14.26358029 medRxiv
Show abstract

Methods INCA is a prospective, single-center cohort study with nationwide recruitment. Participation is open to adult patients and informal caregivers who provide paid informal care through home care agencies (Spitex organizations) in Switzerland. Eligible participants are enrolled consecutively. The cohorts primary outcome is health-related quality of life of patients, assessed monthly through patient-reported outcome measures. Secondary outcomes include home care needs, including the overall health and well-being of patients (measured semi-annually), the type, amount, and quality of care (recorded daily), and caregiver burden and resilience (measured quarterly). Additional analysis will include structured medical data, extracted from patient-provided documents using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology and analysed using Large Language Models (LLM). Results Since recruiting started in July 2025, the cohort has enrolled 855 patients and 851 caregivers. Among patients, 53% are female, with a median age of 73 years. Caregivers are predominantly female (72%) with a median age of 56 years. Most patients experience impairments in physical functioning and participation in social roles. Among them, 85% require less than two hours of care per day, though care needs vary considerably. This is further reflected in the multi-attribute utility, where the overall PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) score is very low for most patients, with a median of 0.102, indicating a substantial need for medical assistance and care. With a median of 9 comorbidities, health-related quality of life is overall low for most patients. Cardiovascular and endocrine & metabolic diseases are amongst the most prevalent, affecting 69% and 65% of patients with available diagnoses (n=771). Certain diagnostic pairs occur more frequently than expected by chance, suggesting underlying links between disease categories. Conclusions INCA responds to a growing policy need for robust evidence on how new models of informal care are associated with the health and well-being of patients and their caregivers. Its longitudinal design, combining patient- and caregiver-reported data with medical records and innovative data extraction methods, will lay the groundwork for a better understanding of new informal care models in real-world settings. INCAs findings are expected to have significant policy relevance and contribute to evidence-based policies on long-term care at home in Switzerland.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.7%
2
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.3%
4
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
5
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
6
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
7
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
8
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Swiss Medical Weekly
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
17
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%