Safety of Subdural Direct Current Stimulation: A Histological Study in the Ovine Brain
Brosch, M.; Oya, H.; Gibson-Corley, K.; Flouty, O.; Howard, M.; Nourski, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundDirect current (DC) stimulation can modulate neuronal activity in ways that differ from pulsatile stimulation, but its intracranial use has been limited by concerns about tissue injury at the electrode/tissue interface. Quantitative safety limits for DC delivered through metal electrodes directly to the brain remain poorly defined. ObjectiveTo estimate histological safety boundaries for DC stimulation delivered through metal electrodes in a large-brain gyrencephalic animal model. MethodsCathodal DC stimulation was applied to the exposed cortical surface of ten anesthetized sheep using platinum-iridium disc electrodes typically used in clinical applications (surface area [≤] 4.15 mm2). Currents of 5 to 1000 {micro}A were delivered for 10 to 15 minutes at 36 cortical sites. Stimulation dose was quantified as charge density. Brains were removed shortly after stimulation and examined histologically for tissue damage, including necrosis, inflammation, gliosis, and demyelination. Lesion volumes were quantified and related to charge density. ResultsNo lesions were observed at sites where no current or a low charge density (0.7 mC/mm2) was delivered. With stimulation, lesion probability and volume increased with charge density, although variability was substantial. Lesions occurred in 3 of 18 sites at lower charge densities (1.4 to 10 mC/mm2) and in 5 of 9 sites at higher charge densities (14.4 to 144.4 mC/mm2). Linear regression of lesion volume against charge density yielded an estimated zero-lesion intercept of 2.3 mC/mm2, whereas alternative nonlinear models predicted thresholds up to 8.7 mC/mm2. ConclusionThese findings suggest that it may be possible to apply cathodal DC stimulation directly to the cortical surface through metal electrodes without detectable histological damage when current intensity, duration, and electrode size are appropriately constrained. These findings provide quantitative guidance for the safe application of DC directly to neural tissue in experimental and translational neuromodulation studies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational modeling of dorsal root ganglion stimulation using an Injectrode 97%
- Non-invasive stimulation with Temporal Interference: Optimization of the electric field deep in the brain with the use of a genetic algorithm 95%
- Magnetic Temporal Interference for Noninvasive Focal Brain Stimulation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode size matter? 96%
- Comparison of TENS electrodes and textile electrodes for electrocutaneous warning 94%
- Intracranial approach for sub-second monitoring of neurotransmitters during DBS electrode implantation does not increase infection rate 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors 92%
- Probabilistic comparison of gray and white matter coverage between depth and surface intracranial electrodes in epilepsy: a patient-specific modeling and empirical study 92%
- Individual head models for estimating the TMS-induced electric field in rat brain 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.