Back

Aggregating data to accelerate personalized therapy in heart failure (ADAPT-HF)

Roeder, C.; Goerg, C.; Talebi, A.; Stevens, L. M.; Scholtens, D. M.; Rasmussen-Torvik, L. P.; Alagna, L. M.; Shah, S. J.; Hall, J. L.; Das, A. K.; Jhund, P. S.; Kao, D. P.

2026-07-16 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.13.26357501 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Increased public access to data from disparate sources provides opportunities to study and validate predictive and subphenotype models in heterogeneous disease conditions using aggregated individual patient data. Robust, explicit, and transparent harmonization of data elements is critical to ensure interpretability, reproducibility, and generalizability of secondary and retrospective analyses. Methods & Results: We designed and implemented ADAPT (Aggregating Data to Accelerate Personalized Therapy), a scalable framework using multiple software packages (R, SQL, BigQuery) that enables rapid, explicit harmonization of structured data elements from randomized trials and observational studies using a standard spreadsheet interface. User-specified criteria are applied to primary study data to produce harmonized longitudinal datasets comprised of demographics, medical history, quantitative observations, repeated measures, and clinical outcomes. We demonstrate this functionality using 26 clinical studies found in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute BioLINCC resource. We illustrate the scalability of ADAPT to the order of billions of datapoints using administrative clinical data in a cloud-computing platform. We also present examples of collaborators using ADAPT for independent harmonization tasks for secondary analyses and democratization of publicly available data. Conclusion: ADAPT is a disease-agnostic, extensible, and scalable platform to support robust, transparent harmonization of structured research data using interfaces accessible to a variety of researchers regardless of programming ability. It extends FAIR principles beyond research data to also represent harmonization analyses by improving Findability of harmonization decisions, Accessibility of methods to other stakeholders, Interoperability with independent analyses and datasets, and Reusability through efficient implementation in a variety of analysis environments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.6%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
3
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
4
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
5
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
8
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
10
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%
24
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
26
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%